mwillems wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 09:22
Simply put, the instruction should have been either to pit or at least to follow max, with the pit ready for both drivers anyway in case either made their own call.
As i said yesterday, I have a feeling that they might have perceived a risk to Lando release in the pit lane as others piled in, and so vetoed both stops.
They may have thought they had the pace to catch Max, and miscalculated, but it's not really the point for me. Oscar would have clearly been 1st and faster than everyone else.
There was no additional risk there.
Yeah, this seems most likely but I'm not sure that they thought they have pace to catch Verstappen, I think they expected many more to stay out, if Verstappen was in a DRS train with 7 midfield cars the outcome could be very different.
Another huge issue was that hard was a good race tire, better than medium for 25 laps. Not sure how they couldn't see that as they prefered strategy before the weekend was a one stopper (so surely a long stint on a hard). Verstappen and the rest of the field effectively ran a one stopper against McLaren on a two stopper. So by using a medium in the middle stint they failed to increase the gaps to the field and exposed them to ANT/SAI.
It's just a huge mistake all around and to cap it off, they pitted Norris out of the way for Verstappen. Piastri winning would be better for Norris and Piastri. I know they may have been worried about Antonelli and Sainz but I think they made a mistake by not defending until Max overtakes.