SB15 wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 19:11
venkyhere wrote: ↑01 Dec 2025, 19:03
The SF25 is a bad car, but it's been an upper-midfielder/top4 car (depending on the track) for majority of the season. We all know the reason - too much risk changing the very skeleton of SF24, and producing a worse car. That said, I believe the reason the SF25 has been really bad, tailender level car over the last few races, is tyre pressure. Pirelli's has been monotonically increasing the min.pressures towards the end this season, and it has really thrown the SF25 into 'untenable' territory, because the 'band-aid' setups that they have been eking out, no longer puts the car in a workable window. Every team, apart from Mclaren has been struggling to adapt these high-tyre pressures, but they have somehow managed, but for Ferrari it has exposed the car's fundamental weakness - kinematics and aero not working together. I have a strong feeling this is the case.
These big Pirelli tyres were a horrible idea and then the added addition of too much stiffness of the suspension and wheel covers, yeah the ground effect era was a disaster and Qatar definitely showed why. Can't even use the ground effect effectively because of the risk of plank wear.
This was compounded by the absolute pantomime enacted by Mercedes as they most of all didn't understand their own design failings. All of that crappshoot of drivers hobbling around etc, properly scuppered Ferrari’s complete design strategy for this era.
Further issue came from FIA change to floor throat and edges for 2023, which forced everyone to just "slam" the chassis if they were to chase more vertical load.
Its Mercedes that have a lot to answer for in this team's performance, and the FIA response to that catastrophic design.