As long as he keeps the field tightly bunched behind, by acting like a SC in sector 3, it means Norris should in theory struggle to undercut him as if he does he'll be in traffic and Max can pick up the pace up front, having baby sat the tyres. And if Norris tries to go long, Max can be strategic when to pick up the pace, will be fascinating to watch.euv2 wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 19:23Might need to bait Lando into having a go into turn 1 and then hold the inside and make Norris yield. Otherwise, he'll mostly have to rely on Lando having a terrible start or contact. Not sure how much backing the drivers behind and forming a train is going to help things.
In theory, he should be able to pick the pace up while some of the field are still out and Piastri in this case gets stuck behind them, you'd expect some of them to start on hards.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 22:28So when Piastri undercuts him or half of the field does, what does Verstappen do?
Juzh wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 22:02Max's pole lap 1:22.207 - just a tenth off his 2021 record
https://streamable.com/wzgv17

The riskiest thing to do from a game theory perspective would be to let McLaren drive a normal race where they will pull away from the cars behind, even with Verstappen winning. That would essentially be betting on a first lap collision or a DNF in free air, both unlikely.venkyhere wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 22:53It also has to be said that 'backing up the pack in S3' to inorder to deny the Mclarens any 'gap' for them to pit into, is also detrimental for Verstappen as well, because there is no guarantee that :
- He won't accidentally end up giving DRS to the McLarens, because he has to do it over so many laps.
- Mclarens wont be able to overtake midfielder cars, even if they come out into traffic after pitting.
- That Russel / LeClerc will have the tyre life to challenge the McLarens and might be forced to pit before them.
- That having 2M, 1H for himself while the McLarens have 1M, 2H might become a problem in case the deg/graining (back/front) is high and it's a 2-stop race.
- Redbull won't screw up a pitstop, since box duration will become critical, apart from in-laps and out-laps (which are critical anyway where tyre life gets eaten away).
The 'backing up' - It's a mega risky thing to do in a track where overtaking is possible. This is not Monaco. In 2016, what allowed Hamilton to do it was because the Mercedes was leagues ahead of other cars in pace. That's not the case here. Plus the track layout was different. So many variables need to be considered - IMHO it's just easier to simply drive at full pace and not worry so much.
But one mistake by Verstappen (misjudged gap) and McLaren is in the lead, who knows if Verstappen can follow and overtake them?Badger wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 23:03The riskiest thing to do from a game theory perspective would be to let McLaren drive a normal race where they will pull away from the cars behind, even with Verstappen winning. That would essentially be betting on a first lap collision or a DNF in free air, both unlikely.venkyhere wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 22:53It also has to be said that 'backing up the pack in S3' to inorder to deny the Mclarens any 'gap' for them to pit into, is also detrimental for Verstappen as well, because there is no guarantee that :
- He won't accidentally end up giving DRS to the McLarens, because he has to do it over so many laps.
- Mclarens wont be able to overtake midfielder cars, even if they come out into traffic after pitting.
- That Russel / LeClerc will have the tyre life to challenge the McLarens and might be forced to pit before them.
- That having 2M, 1H for himself while the McLarens have 1M, 2H might become a problem in case the deg/graining (back/front) is high and it's a 2-stop race.
- Redbull won't screw up a pitstop, since box duration will become critical, apart from in-laps and out-laps (which are critical anyway where tyre life gets eaten away).
The 'backing up' - It's a mega risky thing to do in a track where overtaking is possible. This is not Monaco. In 2016, what allowed Hamilton to do it was because the Mercedes was leagues ahead of other cars in pace. That's not the case here. Plus the track layout was different. So many variables need to be considered - IMHO it's just easier to simply drive at full pace and not worry so much.
Of course slowing down must be done carefully as to not be overtaken, but you can probably do 5 tenths without too much risk, maybe a second later in the stint. Lando isn't going to lunge, Oscar might.
In fairness, this is what Max needs to win. If the race is straightforward, it will be the same 1-2-3 as QF.Paa wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 01:15I don't expect any of these strategies, most of them are not realistic and too unpredictabe.
Maybe he will try to hold the pack together before the 1st pitstop or try to do something during the start to make McLarens lose positions, but nothing extreme like some posts suggest.
I'm just a bit disappointed that most likely he will lose the WDC by 5 or so points.
It was much more conforming when he was 50+ points behind. This way it is just sad. I know he already vastly overachieved, but still you have the feeling you could have grabbed 5 points more, like Spain, Austria, some sprints were not perfect, or doing some better optimizing/setup work with some races etc.
I get that, just people look way too much into this.MYsee wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 01:51In fairness, this is what Max needs to win. If the race is straightforward, it will be the same 1-2-3 as QF.
An unpredictable, low-probability event must occur for him to win. At the same time, we thought it was a low probability for Max to win the WDC when he was 104 pts behind, but here we are!
Pulling hard is the easy strategy to guarantee the win, not the championship. Yes by backing the field up you risk losing due to the factors above, but its exactly those factors that will make it so difficult for Mclaren, arguably even more so. Tbh they havent been crisp in difficult strategic situations, forcing those is definitely something that RB should consider. If the start is clean and 2-3 laps in we end up with verstappen 1st, lando 2nd and piastri 3rd, I think it is the thing to do right away. Once you open up a gap, it becomes much harder to do.venkyhere wrote: ↑06 Dec 2025, 22:53It also has to be said that 'backing up the pack in S3' to inorder to deny the Mclarens any 'gap' for them to pit into, is also detrimental for Verstappen as well, because there is no guarantee that :
- He won't accidentally end up giving DRS to the McLarens, because he has to do it over so many laps.
- Mclarens wont be able to overtake midfielder cars, even if they come out into traffic after pitting.
- That Russel / LeClerc will have the tyre life to challenge the McLarens and might be forced to pit before them.
- That having 2M, 1H for himself while the McLarens have 1M, 2H might become a problem in case the deg/graining (back/front) is high and it's a 2-stop race.
- Redbull won't screw up a pitstop, since box duration will become critical, apart from in-laps and out-laps (which are critical anyway where tyre life gets eaten away).
The 'backing up' - It's a mega risky thing to do in a track where overtaking is possible. This is not Monaco. In 2016, what allowed Hamilton to do it was because the Mercedes was leagues ahead of other cars in pace. That's not the case here. Plus the track layout was different. So many variables need to be considered - IMHO it's just easier to simply drive at full pace and not worry so much.