


If I would be RedBull's TP I would really focus all of my attention to improve simulation/correlation.venkyhere wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 12:42The 'mexico floor' was successfully run in Q in AbuDhabi. Finally they got it to work. In the last race of the regulation era.
https://i.ibb.co/4nWs3PN0/gettyimages-2 ... 8x2048.jpg
This has been a problem that got 'exposed' from 2023 (yes, despite the monster car) itself, when they added more and more load to the car, and the whole 'correlation business' got derailed with the RB20 in 2024. They have 'saved' 2024 and 2025 with some clever 'track data feedback' into the simulator on Friday nights. It proves that the fault is not with the design or setup of the car, but with the 'tools' that they have available to do it. Perhaps all the 'late development work' so far into post summer break months, might help fix the tools (atleast that's what they are telling the media). So it's not something they haven't prioritized, I think they are genuinely 'lost' about how to fix this modelling issue.Paa wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 14:12If I would be RedBull's TP I would really focus all of my attention to improve simulation/correlation.venkyhere wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 12:42The 'mexico floor' was successfully run in Q in AbuDhabi. Finally they got it to work. In the last race of the regulation era.
https://i.ibb.co/4nWs3PN0/gettyimages-2 ... 8x2048.jpg
On one hand Red Bull is the master of maximizing results with what they have on race day, on the other hand I can't help to feel that they leave so much performance on the table by not being able to optimize the HW what they have.
It feels like they have to learn everything on track on the actual race weekend.
I see this as an absolute number one priority, I hope Mekies will address this issue.