Delusional, if you ask me. The Mclaren was absolutely dominant this year with basically no weaknesses. It's insane the title was even remotely close, let alone coming down to just two points. Norris was super underwhelming for most of the season. Putting either of these guys on the level as Leclerc and Russell seems wildly undeserved. Either of them likely would have walked away with the title a long time ago.geogate wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:38McLaren are a 2 times on the trot constructor champion - some people dont think they would know if they only had two mediocre drivers? Think they would pay top rates for mediocre drivers?
Max is out on his own, i dont think anyone argues that - but Norris, Piastri, Leclerc, Russell - they all sitting there on the tier below. They could all beat each other on their day. They all capable of bad days too, drop off in form. Piastri maybe stands out as having more headroom for growth - maybe
No weaknesses?Seanspeed wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:40Delusional, if you ask me. The Mclaren was absolutely dominant this year with basically no weaknesses. It's insane the title was even remotely close, let alone coming down to just two points. Norris was super underwhelming for most of the season. Putting either of these guys on the level as Leclerc and Russell seems wildly undeserved. Either of them likely would have walked away with the title a long time ago.geogate wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:38McLaren are a 2 times on the trot constructor champion - some people dont think they would know if they only had two mediocre drivers? Think they would pay top rates for mediocre drivers?
Max is out on his own, i dont think anyone argues that - but Norris, Piastri, Leclerc, Russell - they all sitting there on the tier below. They could all beat each other on their day. They all capable of bad days too, drop off in form. Piastri maybe stands out as having more headroom for growth - maybe
As well as a team that was, shall we say, suboptimal in race day execution, legality, strategy and pit stops.mwillems wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:46No weaknesses?Seanspeed wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:40Delusional, if you ask me. The Mclaren was absolutely dominant this year with basically no weaknesses. It's insane the title was even remotely close, let alone coming down to just two points. Norris was super underwhelming for most of the season. Putting either of these guys on the level as Leclerc and Russell seems wildly undeserved. Either of them likely would have walked away with the title a long time ago.geogate wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:38McLaren are a 2 times on the trot constructor champion - some people dont think they would know if they only had two mediocre drivers? Think they would pay top rates for mediocre drivers?
Max is out on his own, i dont think anyone argues that - but Norris, Piastri, Leclerc, Russell - they all sitting there on the tier below. They could all beat each other on their day. They all capable of bad days too, drop off in form. Piastri maybe stands out as having more headroom for growth - maybe
Bumps, kerbs, high energy braking into tigh turns, one of the bigger ones was that it was unable to replicate race pace in Q for some time, as well as a lack of feedback at the front.
Despite the obvious strengths, it certainly had issues.
I do wonder if people watch what they thrn talk about. The car has been great, and clearly class apart for majority of the season. But it surely wasnt perfect, and it was clearly a difficult car to drive at timesmwillems wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:46No weaknesses?Seanspeed wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:40Delusional, if you ask me. The Mclaren was absolutely dominant this year with basically no weaknesses. It's insane the title was even remotely close, let alone coming down to just two points. Norris was super underwhelming for most of the season. Putting either of these guys on the level as Leclerc and Russell seems wildly undeserved. Either of them likely would have walked away with the title a long time ago.geogate wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:38McLaren are a 2 times on the trot constructor champion - some people dont think they would know if they only had two mediocre drivers? Think they would pay top rates for mediocre drivers?
Max is out on his own, i dont think anyone argues that - but Norris, Piastri, Leclerc, Russell - they all sitting there on the tier below. They could all beat each other on their day. They all capable of bad days too, drop off in form. Piastri maybe stands out as having more headroom for growth - maybe
Bumps, kerbs, high energy braking into tigh turns, one of the bigger ones was that it was unable to replicate race pace in Q for some time, as well as a lack of feedback at the front.
Despite the obvious strengths, it certainly had issues.
There are many ways a team needs to execute, the one that cumulutively does them best will win. As a team it wasnt even close.littlebigcat wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:49As well as a team that was, shall we say, suboptimal in race day execution, legality, strategy and pit stops.mwillems wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:46No weaknesses?Seanspeed wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:40
Delusional, if you ask me. The Mclaren was absolutely dominant this year with basically no weaknesses. It's insane the title was even remotely close, let alone coming down to just two points. Norris was super underwhelming for most of the season. Putting either of these guys on the level as Leclerc and Russell seems wildly undeserved. Either of them likely would have walked away with the title a long time ago.
Bumps, kerbs, high energy braking into tigh turns, one of the bigger ones was that it was unable to replicate race pace in Q for some time, as well as a lack of feedback at the front.
Despite the obvious strengths, it certainly had issues.
this is more understandable than your previous driver claimmwillems wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:57There are many ways a team needs to execute, the one that cumulutively does them best will win. As a team it wasnt even close.littlebigcat wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:49As well as a team that was, shall we say, suboptimal in race day execution, legality, strategy and pit stops.
Eh?Macklaren wrote: ↑08 Dec 2025, 00:02this is more understandable than your previous driver claimmwillems wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:57There are many ways a team needs to execute, the one that cumulutively does them best will win. As a team it wasnt even close.littlebigcat wrote: ↑07 Dec 2025, 23:49
As well as a team that was, shall we say, suboptimal in race day execution, legality, strategy and pit stops.