Good choices.
For me.
Austin (P2), Mexico (P1), Brazil (P1) - this 3 race stretch won him the championship, Oscar was P5 in all 3 with Max P1, P3, P3.
The only no fault failures for Lando/ team was Netherlands and Austin sprint. Which was what 24 points? Not sure how many Max lost in Austria buy at best 15?AR3-GP wrote: ↑09 Dec 2025, 06:28A car that was normally 2nd (season average) turning into a cucumber for 2 race weekends (Hungary/Bahrain) is an extraordinary circumstance imo. Just as much outside of the control of the driver as a burst oil line. Therefore, I classify them as points losses which were not preventable. A normal 2nd fastest car would have finished 3rd in both races. Lando Norris never had to experience this, but it got balanced out by his 0 points in Zandvoort and Las Vegas. Since I feel that it was a fair rebalancing of the points, then Lando Norris was never entitled to wrapping up the championship with rounds to go. That's only realized by selectively taking into account Lando's no-fault failures, while ignoring Verstappen's (Hungary, Austria, Bahrain).daren_p wrote: ↑09 Dec 2025, 06:01I would have to counter that with LN 18pts lost Zandvoort, while Max gained 3 (moved from 3rd to 2nd). Max potentially lost 15 points in Austria, while Lando lost 7 (possibly 8 ) in COTA sprint due to Oscar crashing him out (& again possibly more in the GP as their car wasn't setup ideal due to lack of data from no cars running in the sprint). Lando lost 18 in Vegas, not sure driving a potato counts as a point lossAR3-GP wrote: ↑09 Dec 2025, 03:46He had a car failure in Zandvoort that was not his fault. That cost him 18 pts. One could also Verstappen lost 15pts in Austria because of another driver crashing into him. Lando Norris also had a car failure in Las Vegas, but one could counter this with the fact that Verstappen had to drive a potato in Hungary where he should have scored P3 in a normal car instead of P9.
![]()
So Lando lost 43(possibly a few more as noted), Max 12
Drivers don't set ride heights and they don't control the simulations/correlation. Teams arrive at the track with the setup that they believe is best from the simulator. Therefore, I do not think the drivers should share the blame with the team.
No but its a team sport, drivers don't design the cars or generally make the strategy calls but get credit when it works. Collective blame and success.
They way some fans of Max are going about it, he will soon get his own category in the adult movie industry
Max hardcore: The Empire Strikes from the Backbauc wrote: ↑09 Dec 2025, 15:00They way some fans of Max are going about it, he will soon get his own category in the adult movie industry![]()
Jokes aside, the truth is usually somewhere in the middle, everyone makes mistakes here and there, but this is a team sport, drivers mistake affects the team, and vice versa.
Norris did make mistake, so did Mclaren (ex Vegas) so it is what it is, like Zak says, we will and lose as a team, that is all.
A DNF and a racing incident are different circumstances… You seem to ignore completely the Austin sprint point loss where Lando was taken out… Unsure the point of the post though.AR3-GP wrote: ↑09 Dec 2025, 03:46One thing that didn't settle well with me was the discourse surrounding Lando's bad luck. He had a car failure in Zandvoort that was not his fault. That cost him 18 pts. One could also Verstappen lost 15pts in Austria because of another driver crashing into him. Lando Norris also had a car failure in Las Vegas, but one could counter this with the fact that Verstappen had to drive a potato in Hungary where he should have scored P3 in a normal car instead of P9.
Therefore Lando Norris was not more affected by bad luck than Max Verstappen. It was relatively equal parts bad luck for both. The championship standings ahead of Abu Dhabi actually reflected that fairness. I'll leave out whether having to drive an inconsistent RB21 was even greater bad luck....![]()
Drivers shouldn’t take the blame for a bad setup, but should take the credit when the setup is on point?… Interesting take
The point of the post is people say Lando should/would have wrapped up the title races ago if not for Zandvoort and Las Vegas. However they only correct Lando's points and not anyone else's, nevermind the elephant in the room which is the difference in car performance over the season that made it possible. That's not a problem, a WDC is won by team and driver. I just think it's wrong to think Lando was entitled to the championship any sooner than Abu Dhabi.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑09 Dec 2025, 20:32A DNF and a racing incident are different circumstances… You seem to ignore completely the Austin sprint point loss where Lando was taken out… Unsure the point of the post though.
At the end Max could have had it, if only he would have been a bit more mature and didn’t ram Russell in Spain, he would have won the Championship by at least 6 points if everything else (bad luck included) remained equal and he can only look in the mirror for that one