“We have our new facilities completed now. We have our own wind tunnel. We have Honda as our engine supplier, and only for us. Aramco, A&E, we have some good things to be optimistic about. But this is a very competitive sport, and everyone is doing a very good job. We'll see,” he added.
I think we can all agree on that. We'll see what they're cooking up. It's a nice touch of intrigue in this "Fernando against all odds" story
Not exactly confidence inspiring stuff for 2026, but could be good long term.De Wet wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 15:46https://www.facebook.com/reel/848520810928878
Staff shake-up by Newey...
Depends on how you look at it...Emag wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 16:34...De Wet wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 15:46https://www.facebook.com/reel/848520810928878
Staff shake-up by Newey...
Not exactly confidence inspiring stuff for 2026, but could be good long term.
While Alonso's optimism is positive, this is clearly a puff piece. It is obvious that the 2025 - 2026 off-season is an improvement over the last year's. Then, the AMR24 had been significantly off the pace, the 2025 season operated under the same regulations with new regs for 2026. This made the bulk of the 2025 development time and funding be shifted toward the 2026 regulations and the AMR26. So, they were significantly behind, the technical team appeared lost at the end of 2024, they needed significant funds to catch up but funds were being redirected to the AMR26.AhmerBaig wrote: ↑14 Dec 2025, 10:57Fernando Alonso confident about 2026
https://www.gpblog.com/en/news/alonso-p ... 2026-claim
Well, no matter when this was announced, if it was within this year it's way too early to have any positive effect on the 2026 car. At least definitely not on the launch spec. I have no doubt that there were valid reasons to let these people go. I mean, Aston started 2023 with pretty much the 2nd best package and they had no clue what to do from there. Massive failure to end up where they did 2 years later. Someone needs to be held accountable, because this wasn't just a small misstep as one might say in Ferrari's case for 2022->2023 and 2024->2025. They literally went from 2nd fastest to barely scrapping for points in the span of a year. Huge drop off.diffuser wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 16:56Depends on how you look at it...Emag wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 16:34...De Wet wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 15:46https://www.facebook.com/reel/848520810928878
Staff shake-up by Newey...
Not exactly confidence inspiring stuff for 2026, but could be good long term.
#1 This was announced over a month ago.
#2 Newey did the same when he started at RBR in 2006.
What we keep hearing is what we saw from RBR in the first weeks of the last set of regs change. Make sure we gave the basics right, then start to develop. That what I expect. Is there a chance someone does a better job than AMR to start the year. It's gonna be what is gonna be. No quantity of hoping from our part is gonna change that.Emag wrote: ↑16 Dec 2025, 22:40Well, no matter when this was announced, if it was within this year it's way too early to have any positive effect on the 2026 car. At least definitely not on the launch spec. I have no doubt that there were valid reasons to let these people go. I mean, Aston started 2023 with pretty much the 2nd best package and they had no clue what to do from there. Massive failure to end up where they did 2 years later. Someone needs to be held accountable, because this wasn't just a small misstep as one might say in Ferrari's case for 2022->2023 and 2024->2025. They literally went from 2nd fastest to barely scrapping for points in the span of a year. Huge drop off.
In any case, with the amount of investments and money that has been going into Aston Martin the last couple of years, in addition to all the new hires (obviously including here Newey), there's a pretty high chance this ends up being a competitive team again in the nearby future. My "concern" is more on Alonso's side, so for him it's a bit critical "how near" is that future.
Would be a shame to see Fernando retire without having a go at a competitive car again.