I find it incredible how your comment validates exactly what I just said about this whole Adami discussion.aMessageToCharlie wrote: ↑06 Jan 2026, 15:07Adami was never "highly regarded" unless this is reddit slang for something else, then I agree.
I don't know what seasons you have watched, but Adami was already the running joke working with (or against) Vettel and the same with Sainz, who had to do all the thinking from the cockpit.
You might want to watch some of these highlights on youtube to refresh your memory.
Anyways, I'm done arguing. What do I care if they want to keep doing what they're doing and getting the results they're getting.
Let's hope they can come up with a monster of a car to compensate because I want to see Leclerc fighting for wins and championships.
Repeating what I said: This Adami discussion only exists because Hamilton had a below-average year, therefore it's necessary to point a finger at someone. If Hamilton had a good year, I doubt you'd be talking about Adami here.
The fact that you ask to see race highlights to see what Adami is like also speaks exactly to what I said, about this discussion being biased, based only on a few controversial phrases and moments that were carefully selected by FOM to broadcast for entertainment purposes. Nobody does an analysis based on the complete communication during the races and Adami's work outside of the races. People here are picking out 3-4 moments of conflict between Adami and the drivers and think that's enough to label him mediocre.
Let's make one thing perfectly clear: Adami did NOT cause Hamilton to lose any races, podiums, or important points in 2025 entirely because of his own fault in failing to provide Lewis with crucial information or providing incorrect information. And before anyone mentions race strategies, Adami alone doesn't decide them.
Hamilton had the opportunity to change, but chose to continue with Adami. That should be the end of this discussion. Enough with this witch hunt. Let's move on.


