2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
wuzak
wuzak
522
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:00
How likely are we to see 450KW~600hp from the engine 54% eff at the start of 2026 season
Unlikely, IMO.

I think they'll be 420-430kW, around 50-52% TE.

User avatar
FW17
172
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:44
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:00
How likely are we to see 450KW~600hp from the engine 54% eff at the start of 2026 season
Unlikely, IMO.

I think they'll be 420-430kW, around 50-52% TE.
The last engines hit 51% at start of 2022 season when it was frozen

wuzak
wuzak
522
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 07:22
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:44
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:00
How likely are we to see 450KW~600hp from the engine 54% eff at the start of 2026 season
Unlikely, IMO.

I think they'll be 420-430kW, around 50-52% TE.
The last engines hit 51% at start of 2022 season when it was frozen
With turbo-compounding?

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
43
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 07:22
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:44
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:00
How likely are we to see 450KW~600hp from the engine 54% eff at the start of 2026 season
Unlikely, IMO.

I think they'll be 420-430kW, around 50-52% TE.
The last engines hit 51% at start of 2022 season when it was frozen
If you mean '600HP' from the ICE, That in my opinion is likely, Also in my opinion the new power unit will take-off with a better thermal efficiency than the previous best of power unit left of, and progress to maybe 3-4 percentage points more.

User avatar
FW17
172
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:12
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 07:22
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 05:44


Unlikely, IMO.

I think they'll be 420-430kW, around 50-52% TE.
The last engines hit 51% at start of 2022 season when it was frozen
With turbo-compounding?
What compounding?

wuzak
wuzak
522
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:46
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:12
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 07:22


The last engines hit 51% at start of 2022 season when it was frozen
With turbo-compounding?
What compounding?
The maximum efficiency was when the MGUH fed power directly to the MGUK.

This is turbo-compounding.

User avatar
djos
116
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:25
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:46
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:12


With turbo-compounding?
What compounding?
The maximum efficiency was when the MGUH fed power directly to the MGUK.

This is turbo-compounding.
In not sure you understand the definition of the word compounding, you can’t compound a turbo without a second turbine!
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
FW17
172
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:25
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:46
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:12


With turbo-compounding?
What compounding?
The maximum efficiency was when the MGUH fed power directly to the MGUK.

This is turbo-compounding.
With compounding of MGU H it was 59%

51% was only from ICE

wuzak
wuzak
522
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

djos wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:49
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:25
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:46


What compounding?
The maximum efficiency was when the MGUH fed power directly to the MGUK.

This is turbo-compounding.
In not sure you understand the definition of the word compounding, you can’t compound a turbo without a second turbine!
Turbo-compounding is where a turbine feeds power back to the crankshaft of an engine to enhance ouput.

Like the Wright R-3350 turbo-compound engine used in the Douglas DC-7 and some versions of the Lockheed Constellation.

The Wright R-3350 was supercharged, but not turbocharged. It had 3 "power recovery turbines" connected to the crankshaft.

A compound turbo setup uses two, or more, I guess, turbos.

wuzak
wuzak
522
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:52
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:25
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 08:46


What compounding?
The maximum efficiency was when the MGUH fed power directly to the MGUK.

This is turbo-compounding.
With compounding of MGU H it was 59%

51% was only from ICE
Was it?

Where is the source for that?

User avatar
FW17
172
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 10:03
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:52
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:25


The maximum efficiency was when the MGUH fed power directly to the MGUK.

This is turbo-compounding.
With compounding of MGU H it was 59%

51% was only from ICE
Was it?

Where is the source for that?

Dont know the source, but a lot of online chatter on RA621H being 1014hp

which would be close to 59-60%

wuzak
wuzak
522
Joined: 30 Aug 2011, 03:26

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 10:20
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 10:03
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:52


With compounding of MGU H it was 59%

51% was only from ICE
Was it?

Where is the source for that?

Dont know the source, but a lot of online chatter on RA621H being 1014hp

which would be close to 59-60%
That'd be with battery assistance.

You can't count battery assistance in teh thermal efficiency calculation.

1014hp = 854hp from ICE.

Which is about 51% TE for the ICE.

Which is what you said.

Turbo-compounding would not give 160hp to the MGUK without battery assistance.

User avatar
BassVirolla
12
Joined: 20 Jul 2018, 23:55

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 10:00
djos wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:49
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 09:25


The maximum efficiency was when the MGUH fed power directly to the MGUK.

This is turbo-compounding.
In not sure you understand the definition of the word compounding, you can’t compound a turbo without a second turbine!
Turbo-compounding is where a turbine feeds power back to the crankshaft of an engine to enhance ouput.

Like the Wright R-3350 turbo-compound engine used in the Douglas DC-7 and some versions of the Lockheed Constellation.

The Wright R-3350 was supercharged, but not turbocharged. It had 3 "power recovery turbines" connected to the crankshaft.

A compound turbo setup uses two, or more, I guess, turbos.
Totally (w)right. :lol:

I'd like to note that the MGUH to MGUK is an electrically linked turbo compounding in place of the mechanical link of the Wright PRT.

Sometimes is overlooked (and understated) such electrical compounding link.

User avatar
FW17
172
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 10:48
FW17 wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 10:20
wuzak wrote:
18 Jan 2026, 10:03


Was it?

Where is the source for that?

Dont know the source, but a lot of online chatter on RA621H being 1014hp

which would be close to 59-60%
That'd be with battery assistance.

You can't count battery assistance in teh thermal efficiency calculation.

1014hp = 854hp from ICE.

Which is about 51% TE for the ICE.

Which is what you said.

Turbo-compounding would not give 160hp to the MGUK without battery assistance.
Numbers are clouded on how much the MGU H could generate, so let us say it generated its capacity

saviour stivala
saviour stivala
43
Joined: 25 Apr 2018, 12:54

Re: 2025/2026 Hybrid Powerunit speculation

Post

The type of turbo compounding used by the formula 1-2025 power unit, ''ETC'' - electric turbocharger, which was a totally different type of compounding to the turbo compounding ''mechanical turbo compounding'' used by the Wright aero engine, could add 160 HP to the crankshaft, and unlike the Wright system, it did not required an extra blow-down exhaust turbine.