The real MGUK.AR3-GP wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026, 00:46Does anyone care to speculate about what is being hidden here?
https://i.postimg.cc/rmqS8Pj9/image.png
The real MGUK.AR3-GP wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026, 00:46Does anyone care to speculate about what is being hidden here?
https://i.postimg.cc/rmqS8Pj9/image.png
What performance advantage? No one can look at the traces from last season and tell me Honda had better deployment than Merc.Juzh wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026, 01:21Honda throws cold water on the-race's absurd claims of lacklustre battery tech.
https://global.honda/en/F1/features/202 ... ry/kakuda/When it comes to the battery, is it fair to think that the performance advantage from the previous PU can be carried over?
“That’s what we believe—and what we hope. Even after the decision to end our activities, battery development continued, not limited to F1 alone. Because of that, it has evolved further, and it’s an area we’re confident in.”
I'd argue that was more down to Honda not developing the engine that Red Bull got access to, more so than anything else since 2022. They have essentially packaged and given Red Bull the same engine for four years. Other teams like Merc being in F1 developed their engines as long as they could write it off under reliability upgrades from 22-25. It is totally possible that internally Honda might have worked on battery tech once they decided to come back. As they even say, they developed battery tech, not limited to F1 alone. They have everything to succeed and will likely be fine.Badger wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026, 01:46What performance advantage? No one can look at the traces from last season and tell me Honda had better deployment than Merc.Juzh wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026, 01:21Honda throws cold water on the-race's absurd claims of lacklustre battery tech.
https://global.honda/en/F1/features/202 ... ry/kakuda/When it comes to the battery, is it fair to think that the performance advantage from the previous PU can be carried over?
“That’s what we believe—and what we hope. Even after the decision to end our activities, battery development continued, not limited to F1 alone. Because of that, it has evolved further, and it’s an area we’re confident in.”
Moves the CoG forward.michl420 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 17:43If they want a low CoG, they should locate the MGUK beside the crankshaft and use the lower part of the fuel tank for fuel.Andi76 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 17:37I actually think that with narrower cars, greater attention is being paid to keeping the CoG low at all costs. This wasn't a top priority for the tanks of recent years, but now it's becoming much more important again. What I'm missing is the oil reservoir and the compressor...could Honda have placed the oil reservoir at the rear like Ferrari did in 2014? In general, it looks like a split turbo design with no compressor and no oil reservoir.
No, you can clearly see that the MGUK is offset from the crankshaft.FW17 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 17:53Rules state in front of engine and same shaft as the crankmichl420 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 17:43If they want a low CoG, they should locate the MGUK beside the crankshaft and use the lower part of the fuel tank for fuel.Andi76 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 17:37
I actually think that with narrower cars, greater attention is being paid to keeping the CoG low at all costs. This wasn't a top priority for the tanks of recent years, but now it's becoming much more important again. What I'm missing is the oil reservoir and the compressor...could Honda have placed the oil reservoir at the rear like Ferrari did in 2014? In general, it looks like a split turbo design with no compressor and no oil reservoir.
It can't be split turbo. The compressor and turbine can only be separated by 175mm.Andi76 wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 17:37I actually think that with narrower cars, greater attention is being paid to keeping the CoG low at all costs. This wasn't a top priority for the tanks of recent years, but now it's becoming much more important again. What I'm missing is the oil reservoir and the compressor...could Honda have placed the oil reservoir at the rear like Ferrari did in 2014? In general, it looks like a split turbo design with no compressor and no oil reservoir.
Yes.
Maybe just a PR gag that people talk or speculate about it.AR3-GP wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026, 00:46Does anyone care to speculate about what is being hidden here?
https://i.postimg.cc/rmqS8Pj9/image.png
No more split turbocharger? Compressor seems to be back in the position of the 2015 engine!!Badger wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 13:07https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G_FNFPtWEAA ... ame=medium
https://i.ibb.co/m5hMYZT9/honda-1.png What a bulky mess these new electrical components are.
Split like previously is not allowed by the '26 regulations.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑21 Jan 2026, 07:28No more split turbocharger? Compressor seems to be back in the position of the 2015 engine!!Badger wrote: ↑20 Jan 2026, 13:07https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G_FNFPtWEAA ... ame=medium
https://i.ibb.co/m5hMYZT9/honda-1.png What a bulky mess these new electrical components are.
Brightened images seem to show an inlet at the front of the engine running through the vee to the compressor inlet, with the two throttle bodies and plenums either side to feed the cylinders.