Ferrari SF-26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Badger
Badger
12
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

wiktor977 wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:53
Badger wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:47
HungarianRacer wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:36


LESS centerline cooling, definitely not zero. Take a look back at 2014, most cars at launch had even smaller airboxes than the SF-26, at a considerably lower PU thermal efficiency... There's still a secondary intake at the base of the triangle behind the driver's helmet, and even though the airbox itself is considerably slimmer than the W17's, the bodywork right under/behind it (centerline above the engine and gearbox) is still definitely larger in volume...
There's definitely no radiators in the airbox, and the inlet only has one compartment going to the engine. Maybe there's something in the shoulders. Also I can't see a secondary inlet behind the driver, it's not visible in the pictures.
https://i.postimg.cc/J7b7dwhV/Ferrari-airbox.jpg
Interesting. Well that's probably going to the shoulders then.

User avatar
FrukostScones
165
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Giando wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:51
FrukostScones wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:45
Badger wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:32

Wouldn't that be against the rules though? The wings must go to high DF mode in case of failure, that looks like it would do the opposite on the front.
C3.10.10 v. The design is such that failure of the system will result in it returning to its Corner Mode position.
well maybe they have a certain system... what I find weird is that RW and FW don't look synchronous in activation; maybe it is just the .gif; nevertheless x-mode on the front looked pretty low down force :D
I guess they were just trying to check if everything worked: when rain is on track, FIA will allow teams to operate X and Z mode just for the front wing, therefore they must have a switch to run the mechanisms independently
really? I know that the FIA will adjust the mode according to the conditions and experience, but I never seen any reference of the front and back used independently. X-mode on the front only in the rain sounds scary. but still interesting.
"I ain't with the FIFA, I'm in Tokyo." LH

cplchanb
cplchanb
11
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 19:13

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Xyz22 wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 12:43
Looks very conservative.
Really hope it’s an early A-Spec version for Spain testing.
They already confirmed that it is

cplchanb
cplchanb
11
Joined: 31 Jan 2017, 19:13

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

I was hoping that they wouldve developed the wheel covers away from the ugly slab that we've seen for years like merc or RB. Guess they didn't bother or we will see something for Melbourne. At least they could've spent £10 on making it gold or silver!

michl420
michl420
24
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Badger wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:47
HungarianRacer wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:36
Badger wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 13:23
One difference between the Ferrari and Merc is that SF26 has zero centerline cooling. As in previous generations the triangular intake seems to only feed the compressor and doesn't serve a cooling function. SF26 thus has slightly bigger sidepod intakes and maybe not as sleek sidepods as W17, but also less bulk in the center.
LESS centerline cooling, definitely not zero. Take a look back at 2014, most cars at launch had even smaller airboxes than the SF-26, at a considerably lower PU thermal efficiency... There's still a secondary intake at the base of the triangle behind the driver's helmet, and even though the airbox itself is considerably slimmer than the W17's, the bodywork right under/behind it (centerline above the engine and gearbox) is still definitely larger in volume...
There's definitely no radiators in the airbox, and the inlet only has one compartment going to the engine. Maybe there's something in the shoulders. Also I can't see a secondary inlet behind the driver, it's not visible in the pictures.
You can`t say this from outside pictures. Some years ago Renault had a centerline radiator that used the same intake as the engine.

LM10
LM10
124
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

While being an early A-spec, this car already has some interesting details.
Come Melbourne we’ll definitely see changes to the sidepod area foremost.

What stands out is the most inwashing front wing we’ve seen. And the biggest talking point so far: a hole in the diffuser.

Peter Ian Staker
Peter Ian Staker
5
Joined: 16 Feb 2022, 16:20

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post



Onboard footage. Looks like a new steering wheel design closer to the Merc's.

wiktor977
wiktor977
33
Joined: 27 Jan 2024, 17:33

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Peter Ian Staker wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 15:48
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT2s53mF ... IwNjQ2YQ==

Onboard footage. Looks like a new steering wheel design closer to the Merc's.
https://www.motorsport-total.com/formel ... 1769165313

Peter Ian Staker
Peter Ian Staker
5
Joined: 16 Feb 2022, 16:20

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

wiktor977 wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 16:02
Peter Ian Staker wrote:
23 Jan 2026, 15:48
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DT2s53mF ... IwNjQ2YQ==

Onboard footage. Looks like a new steering wheel design closer to the Merc's.
https://www.motorsport-total.com/formel ... 1769165313
Interesting...
It's like the 499p hypercar wheel and the Merc F1 wheel had a baby.

GrizzleBoy
GrizzleBoy
33
Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 04:06

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

I think this is the first car ive seen in a while that it looks as though Lewis can actually see out the front of it 😆

wiktor977
wiktor977
33
Joined: 27 Jan 2024, 17:33

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

I would like to see better pictures of this front bib, I'm not sure but it looks like there is a slot/intake, or maybe it's only my imagination

Image

User avatar
atanatizante
131
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 15:33

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

ImageImageImageImage
"I don`t have all the answers. Try Google!"
Jesus

vorticism
vorticism
377
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Looks good and has some of the most interesting features I've seen so far this year. The front wing has a very large first element with two small, moving FWAS elements. Proportionally it looks more like a rear wing--very interesting. The large first element will help with structural integrity at the cost of smaller moving flaps. Merc took a different path by mounting the pylons to the center element at the cost of only having one moving flap. Which method will prevail? They both make a lot of sense to me, as they prevent having a large cantilever linked to a smaller first element like we see on the VCARB, RBR, and Alpine.

First we've seen of a tension element for the floor foot. Sidepod undercut similar to Merc. The sidepod inlet lip is taking advantage of the ~30mm free area of the monocoque, similar to how they installed their S-duct and how teams generally had winglets at the bases of the front suspension arms. The inlet itself is still normally size, as it has to fit inside of a landscape format letterbox of iirc ~15cm in height. A little extra air pushed into the inlet but mostly I'd call it a vortex generator.

wiktor977, that is the t-tray stay, visible in side views of the car. So they've opted to have it exposed along with a more blunt 'ship's bow.' All teams have gone this route that I've seen, instead of a '22 type pointy, fully enclosed t-tray, which was optional.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

User avatar
Marc.W
26
Joined: 04 Mar 2012, 14:08
Location: Belfast, N.I

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

*Edit*

Already posted and confirmed
Last edited by Marc.W on 23 Jan 2026, 16:40, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Giando
93
Joined: 10 Jan 2012, 17:56
Location: Milan (Italy)

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

so where do you think is the front wing mechanism for X / X modes?
is it in the middle of the wing or on the sides?

Image