Or maybe it will be just as big of a blunder.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑26 Jan 2026, 14:12It's a zero pod done right!
I mean zero pod was not compatible with Ground effect floors but it might be a silver bullet in these regs!
Why does sidepod have handle?
Its not a handle. Cars has to have by regulation, side impact crash structure. All cars have these to protect the driver. But some teams put it elsewhere to integrate in to the sidepod and you can not see them. Some team leave them sticking out.
You don't think McLaren, Aston Martin, and Ferrari have enough engineering capacity to design a "zero pod" car?
If the engineering choices at any team driven by emotions from the past, that team is lost already.
Ferrari have the resources but have not been the most radical on packaging (in recent times). McLaren and Aston no, I think such a solution requires total control and integration of the PU and chassis. But maybe they'll prove me wrong.
The air come from the "main" cooler in the sidepods.venkyhere wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 08:30If they are not inlets, where does the air enter from, to exit the 'optional' exit just under the 'ROKT' sticker, near to where the halo ends ?
not impossible, but it would mean that the 'air-path' has to make many 'bends' to move-up-and-back through some sort of heat exchanger, and then make a 'cannon-exit' underneath the ROKT sticker. I would say, unlikely.
They are not close to collecting performance data yet.venkyhere wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 08:26What is the priority ?PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 02:11I think these are vanity side pods. I'm betting that the undercut will be revealed soon.organic wrote: ↑26 Jan 2026, 23:28
What other head-on rb22 shots do you have with enough detail to see a feature like this?
This image shows another point. A startling lack of undercut. Pretty much the only undercut present is the inlet scoop lower lip.
https://i.ibb.co/Xf5GjNJ0/20260126-192901.jpg
I also believe the Mercedes has a "fake" side pod.
playing 'hide-n-seek' with other teams and keeping all cards close to the chest so that others can't 'produce a copy' before mid-season summer break
v/s
collecting real data with the 'real car' for their own benefit in an ultra-comprehensive regulation change ?
Sorry, but Mclaren no? I think, that is quiet some bs. Mclaren was the team, who had the best cooling solution last season.Badger wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 15:04Ferrari have the resources but have not been the most radical on packaging (in recent times). McLaren and Aston no, I think such a solution requires total control and integration of the PU and chassis. But maybe they'll prove me wrong.
Though I wouldn't call RB22 a "zeropod" now that we've seen the pictures up closer, it's not quite that radical. The solution RB has would be possible for several teams in time, but to pull it off out of the gates in a total rules reset is impressive.
Look at some photos where the bodywork is removed. The cooler sits directly vertical under it or even in front of it. In 2021 every car had exits there.
michl420 wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 16:05Look at some photos where the bodywork is removed. The cooler sits directly vertical under it or even in front of it. In 2021 every car had exits there.