Translated:
Aston Martin AMR26 is heading from Birmingham to Girona to participate in the F1 2026 shakedown.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/cvk7020
You probably would not lose anything in qualifying with less dense fuel ,cause you're allowed more flow to compensate. In the first half of the race though that extra weight becomes a large burden to carry.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 12:10We're not really in that much of a disagreement here. All I'm saying is that you would likely need a truly horrible fuel to lose many tenths (I'm interpreting it as almost a second, 8-9 tenths). Obviously there will be better and worse fuels, and likely track to track variance where less dense/more dense fuel perform better, but you would need to lose almost 1/10 of your total engine power in order to get near a second of lost laptime. No team will have a fuel so bad it loses them 10% of their engine power compared to the competition.sucof wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 18:19No, it is not good or bad fuel. You can have more or less energy dense fuel for example, the rules allow this. With the less energy dense fuel you can use more.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 17:19
But it should also be said that just because the difference between a good and a bad fuel can mean many tenths, it in no way means that those are the differences we will see in practice. In reality all teams will probably bring a reasonably good fuel, so we're looking at maybe a few tenths at most. Still a substantial amount of time, but not to the extreme extent the comment implies.
And there are other such parameters.
In the end you can optimise your engine, combustion, to a specific type, based on what method you think will be more beneficial.
But this affects your design for the long term, and you can end up in a dead end while others still can develop and gain more power. Or you can miss a trick with a certain type of fuel and this is also baked in to your structure for the long term.
So it could be that a fuel type that seems less beneficial at first, will end up the best choice.
3-4 tenths difference on average is absolutely possible from fuel alone. 8-9 tenths isn't happening.You would need such a truly awful fuel in order to lose that much power and all engine manufacturers will almost certainly have decent to good fuel at the very least.
A more dense fuel could also mean a slightly smaller gas tank, which then could lower the car's center of gravity.diffuser wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 18:04You probably would not lose anything in qualifying with less dense fuel ,cause you're allowed more flow to compensate. In the first half of the race though that extra weight becomes a large burden to carry.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 12:10We're not really in that much of a disagreement here. All I'm saying is that you would likely need a truly horrible fuel to lose many tenths (I'm interpreting it as almost a second, 8-9 tenths). Obviously there will be better and worse fuels, and likely track to track variance where less dense/more dense fuel perform better, but you would need to lose almost 1/10 of your total engine power in order to get near a second of lost laptime. No team will have a fuel so bad it loses them 10% of their engine power compared to the competition.sucof wrote: ↑27 Jan 2026, 18:19
No, it is not good or bad fuel. You can have more or less energy dense fuel for example, the rules allow this. With the less energy dense fuel you can use more.
And there are other such parameters.
In the end you can optimise your engine, combustion, to a specific type, based on what method you think will be more beneficial.
But this affects your design for the long term, and you can end up in a dead end while others still can develop and gain more power. Or you can miss a trick with a certain type of fuel and this is also baked in to your structure for the long term.
So it could be that a fuel type that seems less beneficial at first, will end up the best choice.
3-4 tenths difference on average is absolutely possible from fuel alone. 8-9 tenths isn't happening.You would need such a truly awful fuel in order to lose that much power and all engine manufacturers will almost certainly have decent to good fuel at the very least.
here it is arriving at the track:FNTC wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 16:34AMR26 is in the air on its way: https://x.com/FranChuvieco/status/2016504440652493250
Translated:
Aston Martin AMR26 is heading from Birmingham to Girona to participate in the F1 2026 shakedown.
The expected flight duration is one hour and 40 minutes.
Plan A is to try to shoot in the afternoon session on Thursday.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/cvk7020

Yeah that's pretty crazymadridista wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 20:02here it is arriving at the track:FNTC wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 16:34AMR26 is in the air on its way: https://x.com/FranChuvieco/status/2016504440652493250
Translated:
Aston Martin AMR26 is heading from Birmingham to Girona to participate in the F1 2026 shakedown.
The expected flight duration is one hour and 40 minutes.
Plan A is to try to shoot in the afternoon session on Thursday.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/cvk7020
The flight was tracked by more than 6k people on Flightradar24 and was #1 worldwide at some point. Crazy stuff
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G_wrH6RXsAE ... me=360x360
Fernando Alonso is still the most followed and respected driver despite his age.Rockypeeters wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 20:33Yeah that's pretty crazymadridista wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 20:02here it is arriving at the track:FNTC wrote: ↑28 Jan 2026, 16:34AMR26 is in the air on its way: https://x.com/FranChuvieco/status/2016504440652493250
Translated:
Aston Martin AMR26 is heading from Birmingham to Girona to participate in the F1 2026 shakedown.
The expected flight duration is one hour and 40 minutes.
Plan A is to try to shoot in the afternoon session on Thursday.
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/flights/cvk7020
The flight was tracked by more than 6k people on Flightradar24 and was #1 worldwide at some point. Crazy stuff
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G_wrH6RXsAE ... me=360x360![]()
Excited for sure. I expect the AM and the Redbull to share some DNA, there was some late exchange in staff in the higher up roles... and apparently the AM has very narrow Sidepods too.
How did he have no gardening leave? Any intellectual capital from Newey's design went straight to Red Bull.madridista wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 03:40Ian Greig , who was Head of Aerodynamics at Aston, left in October and joined Redbull November 26.