The worst rated technical journalist - by whom? Maybe yourself. Of course, everyone is entitled to think whatever they wish. And, for instance, I happen trust his judgement more than yours.sucof wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 01:08SchuMassa wrote: ↑30 Jan 2026, 00:26https://x.com/i/status/2016931889072709765sucof wrote: ↑29 Jan 2026, 19:53
Ok then please list those innovative designs.
The solutions I see are things that existed before or exists on other cars too.
People should stop drawing 0 big conclusions.
All the cars we see are very basic versions of themselves, and I presume most of the interesting details are not on them yet.
But of course, some people know better than Gary Anderson!![]()
![]()
Gary Anderson is the worst rated technical journalist on this forum.
And he listed also nothing.
And you only "listed" one thing, its suspension. Just because it looks a bit different, it does not mean it is a genius solution. Nothing in engineering works like you imagine.
Please stop this.
I said it was innovative, yet you are trying to put different words in my mouth, nowhere did I say it works like magic. But it would be kinda silly to say that it's a conventional car, because it's not.
Let's hope the team gets some good mileage in.

