Aston Martin AMR26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Redragon
24
Joined: 24 May 2011, 12:23

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

Does the top front wing flap has to be activated fully or just a part of it?
Feels to me, it would be activated from the center not the sides.
Just speculating with my zero knowledge

User avatar
JordanMugen
86
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

yinlad wrote:
31 Jan 2026, 00:30
Cars have to be symmetric by the regulations make no mistake
There is a specific allowance for cooling outlets to not be symmetric.

C3.2.3 ...Minimal exceptions to the requirement of symmetry of this Article will be accepted for the
installation of non-symmetrical mechanical components, for asymmetrical cooling requirements
https://www.fia.com/system/files/docume ... 2-10_0.pdf

Inevitably the FIA will have not defined "minimal" in this clause because these rules are vaguely written, and Aston Martin will be well within their rights to argue a much larger vent on one side than the other is "minimal", even if the FIA only intended it to mean slightly fewer louvres on one side of the car than the other.

An oil cooler or other cooler that only exists on one side could be a more than reasonable "non-symmetrical mechanical component" justification for a much larger vent on one side than the other.

Incidentally the MGU-K motor is towards the left side of the car with this new Honda engine (any relation?).

mavesan
mavesan
0
Joined: 31 Jan 2026, 12:42

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post


User avatar
PlatinumZealot
560
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

Chuckjr wrote:
31 Jan 2026, 10:52
Is it possible (I really don't know, I am asking) that one of the reasons for Newey locating the front wheel suspension arm so far back, is to improve the feel the driver experiences as the mount point is closer to driver center? There have been so many complaints over the years of drivers not feeling the front of the car with these radical arm placement trends, that this is an extreme attempt to overcome that problem while maintaining improved anti-dive? Sort of a two birds with one stone idea. Thought came to me as I was looking at the car.

Second, is the huge side exit/opening sending hot air from the side pods to improve air expansion post the side pod pinch point in front of the rear wheel? Their exits are proximal to each other, and why I ask. I know the air coming out of that opening is not clean, but is there enough heat coming out of that opening to improve expansion at the rear wing?
Its not how far back, its the fore/aft angle of the arms at the end of the day that affects how much of the upward force from movement of the wheels goes into the pushrods vertical movement component (and dampers) versus directly into the chassis.

In ground effect regs they were basically making the front of the car as stiff as a go-kart with the little serving of damping to keep things civil over the bumps and curbs, and they seem to have continued down that path in these regulations!
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

Egresi Tamás
Egresi Tamás
49
Joined: 20 Nov 2014, 14:45

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

:twisted:
Image

Emag
Emag
127
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

I am surprised the rear suspension arms can be mounted on the pylons. They look so “noodely” over kerbs in slow-mo shots. Are there any higher quality closeups to better see how they’re mounted exactly? Maybe they’re mounted at the base where the pylons are also supported and not on the pylons directly.
Developer of F1InsightsHub

User avatar
Kiril Varbanov
147
Joined: 05 Feb 2012, 15:00
Location: Bulgaria, Sofia

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

Chuckjr wrote:
31 Jan 2026, 10:52
Is it possible (I really don't know, I am asking) that one of the reasons for Newey locating the front wheel suspension arm so far back, is to improve the feel the driver experiences as the mount point is closer to driver center? There have been so many complaints over the years of drivers not feeling the front of the car with these radical arm placement trends, that this is an extreme attempt to overcome that problem while maintaining improved anti-dive? Sort of a two birds with one stone idea. Thought came to me as I was looking at the car.

Second, is the huge side exit/opening sending hot air from the side pods to improve air expansion post the side pod pinch point in front of the rear wheel? Their exits are proximal to each other, and why I ask. I know the air coming out of that opening is not clean, but is there enough heat coming out of that opening to improve expansion at the rear wing?
Hey Chuck, my 2 cents, as someone who has studied aero for two years alone, and a former F1 TV host, the nerd part of the couple ( :D ):
These cars are incredibly sensitive to ride height - if the nose dives under braking, the center of pressure shifts forward fiercely. By moving the rear mount back and high, you create a massive mechanical resistance to that dive.
In recent years, "extreme anti-dive" has made the front end feel rather numb to drivers because the suspension is essentially locked under load. This geometry is designed to vary caster dynamically. By placing the mount point further back and higher up, the steering axis changes as the suspension compresses.

The second point is even more nuanced, IMHO. In aerodynamics, the air coming out of the sidepods is turbulent, as we know and is slow because it has been shoved through a radiator. Normally, this is an aerodynamic disaster. However, Newey often uses it to "base-bleed." The coke-bottle area is a high-velocity zone. If the air moves too fast and the widening at the back is too aggressive, the flow will separate, thus creating massive drag.
By dumping hot air into the pinch point area, you are essentially filling the hole behind the car. While the air isn't clean enough to produce downforce on the wing itself, the thermal expansion increases the static pressure in the wake. This helps push the clean air over the top of the car to stay attached to the rear wing for longer.

So, essentially 1. the suspension is setup this way to give optimal aero floor height, and give proper feedback to the driver, and 2. the hot air is being used to energize the expansion zone, making the read end package (wind and diffuser) more efficient.

murphy
murphy
1
Joined: 01 Apr 2022, 16:33

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

Emag wrote:
31 Jan 2026, 14:31
I am surprised the rear suspension arms can be mounted on the pylons. They look so “noodely” over kerbs in slow-mo shots. Are there any higher quality closeups to better see how they’re mounted exactly? Maybe they’re mounted at the base where the pylons are also supported and not on the pylons directly.
Not the first Newey has used this, it was the 2021 RB.

DRCorsa
DRCorsa
14
Joined: 15 Jan 2011, 10:32

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

mzso wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 23:38
DRCorsa wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 22:53
mzso wrote:
29 Jan 2026, 20:38


On the video there's clearly nothing there though. Just that tiny hole on the tip. And that trapezoid cover or whatever is also visible on this image. Is it AI enhanced?
I don't know if it's enhanced or not, but the same picture also plays in the latest "THE RACE" YT video
(post above)
It was just a trick of the light. I saw a better photo (or it was in video form) from that angle, and it's clear there's nothing concave there.
There's a removable cap on that area, so let's wait and see...
I agree, this might be too much of a fantasy, but you never know with Newye!

GoranF1
GoranF1
149
Joined: 16 Dec 2014, 12:53
Location: Zagreb,Croatia

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

"I have no idols. I admire work, dedication & competence."