2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
gearboxtrouble
gearboxtrouble
1
Joined: 17 Jan 2026, 19:17

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

Badger wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 12:00
gearboxtrouble wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 05:33
If mid 1:16s are assumed to be flat out by Mercedes today then I suspect the pole time this year will be around 3s faster on much warmer track temperatures, softer tires (C3 is unlikely to be the soft come race weekend) and car evolution. Thats ~2s slower than the 2025 cars in qualifying which is in the ballpark for what most people expected. Race pace would obviously be much slower on energy management.
Based on what precedent? The difference between pole and testing last time we were in Barcelona in 2022 and 2020 was negligible. The cold track helps if anything. Pole this year is going to be in the 1:15 range would be my guess.
They wont be 4s a lap slower. Track temps do matter when it is cool right now and the c3 will probably be the medium or even hard come race weekend. That plus the natural steep learning curve these teams will be on by then would suggest a decently faster ceiling around here by race weekend.

Badger
Badger
28
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

gearboxtrouble wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 20:01
Badger wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 12:00
gearboxtrouble wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 05:33
If mid 1:16s are assumed to be flat out by Mercedes today then I suspect the pole time this year will be around 3s faster on much warmer track temperatures, softer tires (C3 is unlikely to be the soft come race weekend) and car evolution. Thats ~2s slower than the 2025 cars in qualifying which is in the ballpark for what most people expected. Race pace would obviously be much slower on energy management.
Based on what precedent? The difference between pole and testing last time we were in Barcelona in 2022 and 2020 was negligible. The cold track helps if anything. Pole this year is going to be in the 1:15 range would be my guess.
They wont be 4s a lap slower. Track temps do matter when it is cool right now and the c3 will probably be the medium or even hard come race weekend. That plus the natural steep learning curve these teams will be on by then would suggest a decently faster ceiling around here by race weekend.
All those arguments could apply to 2022 as well. C3 is traditionally the soft in Spain.

User avatar
stephen
0
Joined: 16 Jul 2023, 15:00
Location: US

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

386 laps for the Ferrari engine today. That's tell a story about the engine's reliability.
Stephen Marengo
My F1 favorites: Community | Team | Driver

User avatar
FrukostScones
165
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

when you forget to close your x to the z:

"I ain't with the FIFA, I'm in Tokyo." LH

User avatar
f1316
88
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

Luscion wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 19:49
Total amount of laps done

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G_7cJRpWoAA ... me=900x900
Cadillac kinda skewing the picture (since their lack of laps had nothing to do with the PU) and RB only two teams. So with those things in mind, if we’re looking at laps per manufacturer as an indicator of reliability, those three are pretty equal.

On a different note: one thing I find odd is the teams apparently being annoyed about the lack of secrecy and pictures getting out there. Aren’t the people you want to keep things secret from the other teams (all of whom are literally standing there watching your car every time it goes by)? Why care about whether people outside your rivals are getting info? Weird.

User avatar
langedweil
0
Joined: 23 Mar 2018, 20:51
Location: Caribbean

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

f1316 wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 21:49
Luscion wrote:
30 Jan 2026, 19:49
Total amount of laps done

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G_7cJRpWoAA ... me=900x900
Cadillac kinda skewing the picture (since their lack of laps had nothing to do with the PU) and RB only two teams. So with those things in mind, if we’re looking at laps per manufacturer as an indicator of reliability, those three are pretty equal.

On a different note: one thing I find odd is the teams apparently being annoyed about the lack of secrecy and pictures getting out there. Aren’t the people you want to keep things secret from the other teams (all of whom are literally standing there watching your car every time it goes by)? Why care about whether people outside your rivals are getting info? Weird.
Yeah well, that follows the same route .. doesn't ?
It's a bit silly as teams themselves will shoot very high resolution material of all their competition, just to compare or watch for missed ideas.
Think the secrecy is mainly part of the Bahrein contracts, and the fact that possibly way more (serious) issues could have been visible because of the extremely new cars; something that might even somehow hurt global brands like Mercedes, Ferrari, Audi and Honda. The latter PU for instance so far doesn't scream power/efficiency/reliability at the moment, eventhough stuff like happens when you first seriously test things IRL. Honda will surely get on top of it as shown over the last few years, but still ...
HuggaWugga !

kptaylor
kptaylor
0
Joined: 01 Feb 2012, 22:11
Location: Cluj-Napoca, RO

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

The teams are pissed because the FIA made a big deal about it being a closed test to protect Bahrain, yet didn't properly enforce security so the teams see it as lost revenue, especially if they had no sponsor livery showing.

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

It would have been better if the FIA just gave the teams a 2 day shakedown of there own or 5 days of testing at both pre season tests instead of this shakedown.

FittingMechanics
FittingMechanics
19
Joined: 19 Feb 2019, 12:10

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

What is the source of this idea that the teams are pissed off?

Not sure why they would be.

edu2703
edu2703
37
Joined: 03 Jun 2015, 23:47
Location: Brazil

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

Do we know if the teams are already using synthetic fuel in testing?

I saw a news item on AMuS that some suppliers had requested permission from the FIA ​​to use non-compliant fuel in pre-season testing. So perhaps there's a possibility that some engine manufacturers haven't yet tested their power unit on track with synthetic fuel.

User avatar
Wouter
114
Joined: 16 Dec 2017, 13:02

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

edu2703 wrote:
31 Jan 2026, 18:25
Do we know if the teams are already using synthetic fuel in testing?

I saw a news item on AMuS that some suppliers had requested permission from the FIA ​​to use non-compliant fuel in pre-season testing. So perhaps there's a possibility that some engine manufacturers haven't yet tested their power unit on track with synthetic fuel.
.
The teams are using synthetic fuel from the start of the Australian GP.

User avatar
AR3-GP
535
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

I think Bahrain when the temperatures are higher will be a far better barometer as to how well the cars are working. The cars with better tire management will come to fore in those conditions whereas it wouldn't show as much in Barcelona. Those cars might have even been handicapped by the cooler conditions as we saw from Mclaren last year.
Beware of T-Rex

Emag
Emag
133
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
03 Feb 2026, 04:36
I think Bahrain when the temperatures are higher will be a far better barometer as to how well the cars are working. The cars with better tire management will come to fore in those conditions whereas it wouldn't show as much in Barcelona. Those cars might have even been handicapped by the cooler conditions as we saw from Mclaren last year.
This is true when you speak in terms of relative performance. McLaren just lost a bit of their edge on cooler conditions compared to others. But almost always for every F1 car, they will be faster at 10 degrees compared to 30 degrees (assuming track temp is high enough for tires to get to and stay within the optimum window).
Developer of F1InsightsHub

User avatar
Jambier
5
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 11:02
Location: France

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

Wouter wrote:
01 Feb 2026, 13:17
edu2703 wrote:
31 Jan 2026, 18:25
Do we know if the teams are already using synthetic fuel in testing?

I saw a news item on AMuS that some suppliers had requested permission from the FIA ​​to use non-compliant fuel in pre-season testing. So perhaps there's a possibility that some engine manufacturers haven't yet tested their power unit on track with synthetic fuel.
.
The teams are using synthetic fuel from the start of the Australian GP.
What would be the benefit not to use synthetic fuel since the start of testing ?

FittingMechanics
FittingMechanics
19
Joined: 19 Feb 2019, 12:10

Re: 2026 Pre-Season Testing

Post

Jambier wrote:
03 Feb 2026, 12:37
Wouter wrote:
01 Feb 2026, 13:17
edu2703 wrote:
31 Jan 2026, 18:25
Do we know if the teams are already using synthetic fuel in testing?

I saw a news item on AMuS that some suppliers had requested permission from the FIA ​​to use non-compliant fuel in pre-season testing. So perhaps there's a possibility that some engine manufacturers haven't yet tested their power unit on track with synthetic fuel.
.
The teams are using synthetic fuel from the start of the Australian GP.
What would be the benefit not to use synthetic fuel since the start of testing ?
I'm of the opinion everyone (or at least most of the teams) used real 2026 fuel as it makes sense to do in testing, especially behind closed doors. All the rumors about the fuel seem to be just speculation because FIA allowed the teams options to not use 2026 fuels.

But, to steelman this argument, if the team is unsure of reliability of their engine and are worried it will cause their car to break down, by using non 2026 fuels they can check off everything else. For example they can check aero, integration, gearbox, test how these cars drive with the electrical energy, etc. You could theoretically leave the fuel check for a second or third test, especially if you are behind schedule.