2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
Sergej
3
Joined: 09 Apr 2024, 19:00

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

Autosprint and Fulvio Solms (author of the article) are not very reliable though. Better to wait for official confirmations at this stage.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
665
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

SB15 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 13:08
.. the FIA ​​carried out static hot checks with the car stationary in order to measure the compression ratio of the Mercedes power unit.
The PUAC will meet soon to finalize the measurement procedures, namely, testing at rest but replicating the powertrain's operating conditions on the track.....
testing at 0 rpm to replicate the behaviour at 12000 rpm ?

at 12000 rpm the conrod and crankshaft have a net load at TDC of about 3 tons
briefly but significantly 'stretching' the rod and 'bending' the crankshaft - further compressing the in-cylinder gas

FNTC
FNTC
22
Joined: 03 Nov 2023, 21:27

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

The test at "ambient" is probably not at 15k rpm either

Emag
Emag
132
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

SB15 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 13:08
According to
@autosprint, the FIA ​​carried out static hot checks with the car stationary in order to measure the compression ratio of the Mercedes power unit.

The tests were successfully completed. The PUAC (Power Unit Advisor Committee) will meet soon to finalize the measurement procedures, namely, testing at rest but replicating the powertrain's operating conditions on the track.



I don't know if it's true, but that pretty much ends the debate/controversy and could also explains Antonelli's absence from track this morning.
How? There were other cars running Mercedes PU on track this morning.
Developer of F1InsightsHub

Matt2725
Matt2725
9
Joined: 02 Mar 2023, 13:12

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

Emag wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 14:15
SB15 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 13:08
According to
@autosprint, the FIA ​​carried out static hot checks with the car stationary in order to measure the compression ratio of the Mercedes power unit.

The tests were successfully completed. The PUAC (Power Unit Advisor Committee) will meet soon to finalize the measurement procedures, namely, testing at rest but replicating the powertrain's operating conditions on the track.



I don't know if it's true, but that pretty much ends the debate/controversy and could also explains Antonelli's absence from track this morning.
How? There were other cars running Mercedes PU on track this morning.
You only need to test one. Might as well be the works team.

Emag
Emag
132
Joined: 11 Feb 2019, 14:56

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

Matt2725 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 14:16
Emag wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 14:15
SB15 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 13:08
According to
@autosprint, the FIA ​​carried out static hot checks with the car stationary in order to measure the compression ratio of the Mercedes power unit.

The tests were successfully completed. The PUAC (Power Unit Advisor Committee) will meet soon to finalize the measurement procedures, namely, testing at rest but replicating the powertrain's operating conditions on the track.



I don't know if it's true, but that pretty much ends the debate/controversy and could also explains Antonelli's absence from track this morning.
How? There were other cars running Mercedes PU on track this morning.
You only need to test one. Might as well be the works team.
Why test on a mounted engine? Also why test now in the middle of the session? They could have done it yesterday in the afternoon, or after today's session ended.
Developer of F1InsightsHub

SB15
SB15
7
Joined: 15 Feb 2025, 22:47

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

Emag wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 14:24
Matt2725 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 14:16
Emag wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 14:15


How? There were other cars running Mercedes PU on track this morning.
You only need to test one. Might as well be the works team.
Why test on a mounted engine? Also why test now in the middle of the session? They could have done it yesterday in the afternoon, or after today's session ended.
Who knows? Either way what mostly matters is if they passed or not (if the reports are true)

Badger
Badger
28
Joined: 22 Sep 2025, 17:00

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

Come on guys... They were doing a new "hot" test (that hasn't even been voted on or approved yet) in the middle of a pre-season test session? This wasn't even considered a likely outcome until a few days ago but now the FIA has turned up with all the right equipment to perform a new test that no one has yet defined? LOL.

FittingMechanics
FittingMechanics
19
Joined: 19 Feb 2019, 12:10

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

If any test was done, it surely would not be done on Antonelli's engine after he did 3 laps forcing him to lose half a day. They would use a spare engine Mercedes has. They have 4 teams there, there are at least 4 more engines, probably even more.

We need to remember that most of these websites make things up for clicks.

gearboxtrouble
gearboxtrouble
1
Joined: 17 Jan 2026, 19:17

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

It is hard to believe that they would have come up with a credible hot compression test and then performed it overnight. The only way this story is true is if Mercedes themselves tried something to show their hot compression ratio to the FIA.

Hoffman900
Hoffman900
238
Joined: 13 Oct 2019, 03:02

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

This whole thing is a farce, from the rules, to the “test”, etc.

basti313
basti313
29
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 14:49

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

Hoffman900 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 16:27
This whole thing is a farce, from the rules, to the “test”, etc.
Yes. "The Test" does simply not exist. Or can anyone here explain how some FIA staff walks into the garage, gets on the F1 car rolling in, and measures the CR??? This is simply impossible, there is no measurement they can take like this.
Don`t russel the hamster!

fourmula1
fourmula1
0
Joined: 16 Nov 2021, 23:22

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

If I had to take a guess now it seems like we know absolutely nothing.....the only thing we have are rules and updates to the rules....not sure if anyone has that timeline.

Hoffman900
Hoffman900
238
Joined: 13 Oct 2019, 03:02

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

basti313 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 17:56
Hoffman900 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 16:27
This whole thing is a farce, from the rules, to the “test”, etc.
Yes. "The Test" does simply not exist. Or can anyone here explain how some FIA staff walks into the garage, gets on the F1 car rolling in, and measures the CR??? This is simply impossible, there is no measurement they can take like this.
Yes there is, a Katech Whistler is used by many sanctioning bodies and is surprisingly accurate when compared against actual measurements. I’ve shared this many times.

But “hot” in the pits doesn’t capture what’s happening in a running / firing engine.

basti313
basti313
29
Joined: 22 Feb 2014, 14:49

Re: 2026 Drama: Alleged engine loophole

Post

Hoffman900 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 18:24
basti313 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 17:56
Hoffman900 wrote:
12 Feb 2026, 16:27
This whole thing is a farce, from the rules, to the “test”, etc.
Yes. "The Test" does simply not exist. Or can anyone here explain how some FIA staff walks into the garage, gets on the F1 car rolling in, and measures the CR??? This is simply impossible, there is no measurement they can take like this.
Yes there is, a Katech Whistler is used by many sanctioning bodies and is surprisingly accurate when compared against actual measurements. I’ve shared this many times.

But “hot” in the pits doesn’t capture what’s happening in a running / firing engine.
I do not really believe that these gas displacement methods work well due to gas expansion...but, ok I guess you are right.
If they use the simpel orifice method to trick the compression, this slow pressure method will read ok values, as air can go through the orifice during the test. As you mention, it does not assess the firing engine. So this will show 16.
Don`t russel the hamster!