It’s just the difference in fully aero loaded, and not fully loaded. Carbon fibre is not infinitely stiff.AR3-GP wrote: ↑17 Feb 2026, 12:32Focus on the bottom of the picture, not the top.
https://i.postimg.cc/fLssP7L2/Merc-Wing-Endplate.gif
It’s just the difference in fully aero loaded, and not fully loaded. Carbon fibre is not infinitely stiff.AR3-GP wrote: ↑17 Feb 2026, 12:32Focus on the bottom of the picture, not the top.
https://i.postimg.cc/fLssP7L2/Merc-Wing-Endplate.gif
This is my point. The twist in the entire RW structure is the issue and is something that current rules don't appear to have thought aboutAR3-GP wrote: ↑17 Feb 2026, 12:32Focus on the bottom of the picture, not the top.
https://i.postimg.cc/fLssP7L2/Merc-Wing-Endplate.gif
Ednplates are slanted to make the airflow turn. This generates drag. If you would reduce the angle in SLM mode, you will reduce the drag of the endplate. I can't say that is what Mercedes is doing here, but this is Formula 1...The attention to detail is extremely high. The wing is not doing this by accident.

Are Ferrari and Alpine pylons made of diamond?djos wrote: ↑17 Feb 2026, 12:59It’s just the difference in fully aero loaded, and not fully loaded. Carbon fibre is not infinitely stiff.AR3-GP wrote: ↑17 Feb 2026, 12:32Focus on the bottom of the picture, not the top.
https://i.postimg.cc/fLssP7L2/Merc-Wing-Endplate.gif
FullSphere3758 wrote:Is the test 2 being broadcast in full or is it still 1 hour each day ?
The same reason we can't have thermal cameras anymore, despite it being one of the coolest (not pun intended) broadcast innovations when it came about 13+ years ago. The teams will block it. And then spend exorbitant amounts of time and/or money trying to predict their rivals' energy outside of public view. And then complain it's too complicated.
Main issue was the gearbox I think, something about overheating and damaging the floor which made the car unstable, but yes, the points stands, Newey has the best record, but he has good and bad days as all of us.