My lord, everything about this is meh. The silly 10+ seconds of revving the engine and the angry beehive sound it makes, the moronic flashing lights (I hope this will be deactivated on race starts!!!), how slow they are off the line.
Rightfully so.TeamKoolGreen wrote:Despite all the snarky remarks that the drivers made about the safety of the starts , Peter Windsor says the last thing we should be doing is making the starts more complicated. Speed differentials are the start really are dangerous and have killed and injured people.
But hey , the drivers laughed it off so it should be fine.
Not just at the start, some are talking of up to 60kph difference on straights, because of different battery stages and strategies, and that is a massive amount!TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑18 Feb 2026, 20:18Despite all the snarky remarks that the drivers made about the safety of the starts , Peter Windsor says the last thing we should be doing is making the starts more complicated. Speed differentials are the start really are dangerous and have killed and injured people.
But hey , the drivers laughed it off so it should be fine.
Last year in testing the fastest time was 1:29.5.Mikey05021984 wrote: ↑18 Feb 2026, 19:00Last year pole position was 1:29,8 (at last year of stable regs)
Today fastest time is 1:33,4 (with 2 more testdays to go and a lot of power to unlock).
It seems they wil not be so much slower after all…
What do you think?
I also noticed this but the goal would be to make the defender us his energy inefficiently for several laps in a row making them easy to overtake in the end.LionsHeart wrote: ↑18 Feb 2026, 19:47I watched the entire eight hours of testing attentively. I tried not to get distracted, so as not to lose sight of anything. I was amused by how, from time to time, some drivers couldn't overtake, but the one in front would boost and start pulling away. I'd never seen that before in F1. It was so obvious that it was hilarious.
Maybe we also need a rule where cars aren't allowed to be within 1 second of each other on the straight....Rikhart wrote: ↑18 Feb 2026, 20:21Not just at the start, some are talking of up to 60kph difference on straights, because of different battery stages and strategies, and that is a massive amount!TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑18 Feb 2026, 20:18Despite all the snarky remarks that the drivers made about the safety of the starts , Peter Windsor says the last thing we should be doing is making the starts more complicated. Speed differentials are the start really are dangerous and have killed and injured people.
But hey , the drivers laughed it off so it should be fine.
I saw something similar on Red Bull's practice start last week.
Hadjar came from P7 or something and was practically leading by T1 last week.
A comparison with the last year of cars is entirely fair. Comparing with 2022 cars is simply a different comparison, not an inherently more 'fair' one.
I actually disagree - because they’re smaller, more nervous, less downforce, I think there’s a bit more of a sensation of speed. Look at the cars in, like, 2001 - they look super fast but are actually many seconds slower than even 2026.Seanspeed wrote: ↑18 Feb 2026, 20:28Last year in testing the fastest time was 1:29.5.Mikey05021984 wrote: ↑18 Feb 2026, 19:00Last year pole position was 1:29,8 (at last year of stable regs)
Today fastest time is 1:33,4 (with 2 more testdays to go and a lot of power to unlock).
It seems they wil not be so much slower after all…
What do you think?
Seems like they're gonna be just as slow as forecasted. And moreover, they're gonna LOOK slower, since higher straightline speeds aren't really visible.