Ferrari SF-26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
michl420
michl420
25
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Emag wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 13:21
Seanspeed wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 13:19
Is the comparatively slow deactivation speed not a huge problem? You want all the downforce you can get the moment you slam on the brakes, so it seems like the ideal situation would be to start the deactivation before you hit the brakes? But that seems like it'd be complicated to setup.
I was thinking about this actually. It might be a problem for corners which require steering input very quickly after braking (T1 Australia for example). The rear might be less stable for longer than others.

But we have only seen slow-mo videos of the mechanism. Maybe it's fast enough to flip where it's not an issue for most cases.
The driver can push the slm button to close it.

michl420
michl420
25
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

What loophole allows this winglet behind the exhaust?

User avatar
Gridlock
42
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

michl420 wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 14:38
What loophole allows this winglet behind the exhaust?


.poz wrote:
18 Feb 2026, 10:23
ryaan2904 wrote:
18 Feb 2026, 10:01
Can this be copied by others before Race 1?
No.

"Engineers are permitted to position an aerodynamic device in that area of the car, provided it does not exceed a distance of 60 millimeters from the half-shaft (or driveshaft). Typically, this constraint prevents the device from extending beyond the tip of the exhaust; however, the Maranello engineers managed to bypass this hurdle by shifting the differential to the furthest possible rearward position, utilizing the space beneath the rear crash structure. The entire area was designed from the outset with the introduction of this innovation in mind, which is codenamed FTM within the Scuderia’s garage."

(form it.motorsport.com - translated with gemini)
#58

User avatar
dmjunqueira
21
Joined: 12 Nov 2013, 20:55
Location: Brazil

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Everybody:
“Wow, that’s a bold wing from Alpine.”
Ferrari engineers:
“Hold my wine.”

User avatar
De Wet
18
Joined: 03 Jan 2024, 13:32

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Gridlock wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 14:39
michl420 wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 14:38
What loophole allows this winglet behind the exhaust?


.poz wrote:
18 Feb 2026, 10:23
ryaan2904 wrote:
18 Feb 2026, 10:01
Can this be copied by others before Race 1?
No.

"Engineers are permitted to position an aerodynamic device in that area of the car, provided it does not exceed a distance of 60 millimeters from the half-shaft (or driveshaft). Typically, this constraint prevents the device from extending beyond the tip of the exhaust; however, the Maranello engineers managed to bypass this hurdle by shifting the differential to the furthest possible rearward position, utilizing the space beneath the rear crash structure. The entire area was designed from the outset with the introduction of this innovation in mind, which is codenamed FTM within the Scuderia’s garage."

(form it.motorsport.com - translated with gemini)
Mclaren has this... Sure they can easily increase the size...

Image

michl420
michl420
25
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Gridlock wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 14:39
michl420 wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 14:38
What loophole allows this winglet behind the exhaust?


.poz wrote:
18 Feb 2026, 10:23
ryaan2904 wrote:
18 Feb 2026, 10:01
Can this be copied by others before Race 1?
No.

"Engineers are permitted to position an aerodynamic device in that area of the car, provided it does not exceed a distance of 60 millimeters from the half-shaft (or driveshaft). Typically, this constraint prevents the device from extending beyond the tip of the exhaust; however, the Maranello engineers managed to bypass this hurdle by shifting the differential to the furthest possible rearward position, utilizing the space beneath the rear crash structure. The entire area was designed from the outset with the introduction of this innovation in mind, which is codenamed FTM within the Scuderia’s garage."

(form it.motorsport.com - translated with gemini)
Is it really the driveshaft or do they mean the leg of the wishbone? But for me none of them is in 60mm distance.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HBc9dbuWoAE ... name=small

User avatar
Gridlock
42
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Ferrari now back to "traditional" SLM rear wing with a central actuator on track fwiw.
#58

User avatar
McG
-24
Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 17:45

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Kalsi wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 13:29
Hot stuff here... Looks like the exhaust flap is blowing really hard.
You can see the breather smoke literally being thrown updards
I dont remember seeing anything like this before

https://i.postimg.cc/nzGtpM7x/2026-02-1 ... -speed.gif
https://i.postimg.cc/2yy9M5xS/ezgif-1fd ... 6d2cf0.gif
This has been happening for a long time and not just Ferrari cars but Ferrari powered cars too. Also the exhaust gas shoots upwards as far back as I can remember woth the central single exhaust. Have a look at some engine failures at speed to see the direction.
Finally, everyone knows that Red Bull is a joke and Max Verstappen is overrated.

dialtone
dialtone
139
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

nim_peter wrote:
19 Feb 2026, 19:19
If the inverted flap is indeed creating lift, can the car run softer suspensions and run much lower to the ground and not porpoise in the straights?
Not a venturi tunnel so it shouldn't porpoise either way.

Luscion
Luscion
129
Joined: 13 Feb 2023, 01:37

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

https://autoracer.it/ferrari-sf26-bahra ... va-stallo/ Ferrari's rotating rear wing
"When the flap returns to its active position before braking, the rear downforce increases rapidly, as does the diffuser's extraction. If the transition is not perfectly controlled, there could be effects on stability when entering a corner. Ferrari appears to have worked extensively on miniaturizing the actuator and integrating the system into the side supports. This suggests it is not just a wide range of movement, but a very refined management of aerodynamic moments during rotation. In summary, it is not a simple flap that opens. It is a wing that on the straight is almost 'deactivated' from an aerodynamic point of view. And it is precisely this radical nature, more than the angle achieved, that makes the technical solution extremely interesting."
Once adopted, the engineers hoped to see a gain of 5-7 km/h from the controlled stall. This also has a drawback, namely a couple of points less in downforce. The solution would bring over 1 tenth of a second per lap on straights, under certain conditions on low downforce tracks. A competitor's technician said that it is quite complicated to replicate it quickly, firstly because of the budget cap, and also because it takes a few months to optimize the aero platform, not to mention reliability.
Given the surprise and attention from the teams towards this novel solution, the head of the FIA's technical department, Nikolas Tombazis, was also asked for his opinion. 'We generally encourage solutions that can reduce drag. This is why the rules regarding DRS adjustments have changed compared to last year, giving teams more freedom. As far as we are concerned, the Ferrari solution is ok!
Last edited by Luscion on 19 Feb 2026, 19:38, edited 1 time in total.

GrizzleBoy
GrizzleBoy
35
Joined: 05 Mar 2012, 04:06

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Porpoising or not, if it does indeed reduce downforce by any significant amount, they will be able to run softer setups that would otherwise possibly increased plank wear to unacceptable levels.

Softer setup will probably help a tonne with traction which is going to be like gold dust this year.

Maybe China last year left people's heads on chopping blocks who are desperate to get off of them 😆

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
187
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

I don't think they'll run the car any softer. This year there is practically zero plank wear with the wings open anyway, all the wear happens in high DF mode, for which this has no effect.

I think it's just detaching the main plane flow, with the expense of some efficiency near the end plates.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

Brahmal
Brahmal
58
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Double post
Last edited by Brahmal on 19 Feb 2026, 20:26, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
sucof
38
Joined: 23 Nov 2012, 12:15

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

I do not think this changes downforce so much that they will run different suspension... downforce wise this will be a very small change.
However I think the upper rotated wing will affect the lower (even if it is behind) that it stalls more. The two together probably creates a flow that will make both planes lot less draggy, and this might be the main function. So it is not separately the upper plane that we shall think about.
Add to this, that such a wing can be profiled designed to enhance this effect. This will not be just a regular shaped wing which has a rotating upper plane.

.poz
.poz
53
Joined: 08 Mar 2012, 16:44

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

In my opinion, the greatest benefit comes from the removal of the central actuator. Less drag and cleaner airflow over the wing.