I am not yet convinced but I sure hope you’re right. The thing is, I can enjoy F2 and FE. They produce some good races. But to me F1 is about more than that. It is about seeking the edge of what is possible. This should be the pinnacle of motorsport. The speed (and sound) is what made F1 what it was. Sure, for safety concerns regulations should try to limit this somewhat, but this appears to be too much to me. We’ll see when the flag drops how things really stand.matt_s wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 21:55Obviously we haven't seen them actually race yet, but a number of the traits of these cars look like they could promote good racing.McL-H wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 20:43To me this is not F1 anymore. These regulations are extremely dull. Look how slow they are through the corners. Why why do they keep messing up this racing series so bad? All it needed was last year regulations with proper screaming V10 engine, bio fuel if they please. No no. Lada cornering is what we get.
Yes, the teams will need some time to learn and optimise PU usage, and maybe they will tweak the regs on harvesting.
Yes, there is a danger that one team is ahead of the pack in this reg cycle.
However, "slow" through the corners is not all bad IMHO. They are slower because the cars have a lot less downforce. Drivers should no longer be able to just step on it and hold on through corners like Eau Rouge. They will be more on the edge, hopefully resulting in driver skill being a greater differentiator.
2025 cars were about 10 seconds faster than they were in the early 90's on many comparable tracks, were the cars rubbish to watch back then?
Also, due to lower DF, higher straight line speed, and lower mechanical grip from smaller contact patch, braking distances are longer. With longer braking zones, there is more scope for drivers to make moves under braking.
Almost every manufacturer in F1 is running a V8 or V10 in other series.mzso wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:09TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 05:21This is not true at all. WRC got rid of hybrid and used sustainable fuel in 2025. Ben Sulayem has a lot of power and he supports the idea. He has already chaired meetings about it. So you are just wrong.
If you got rid of the MGU-H, you might as well not have hybrids at all. It was the one thing that actually made hybrids functional in F1. Even going back to the 2014 configuration with an equal displacement V8 would be fine by me.I think it is/was little more than a populist exercise. IMO the chance for it actually happenning is remote.
In F1 the manufacturers care about engine tech.
These regs weren't designed to promote good racing. They exist for one reason, to make the power unit work. The 2022 chassis regs were only 4 years old. The chassis and aero wasn't supposed to change.matt_s wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 21:55Obviously we haven't seen them actually race yet, but a number of the traits of these cars look like they could promote good racing.McL-H wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 20:43To me this is not F1 anymore. These regulations are extremely dull. Look how slow they are through the corners. Why why do they keep messing up this racing series so bad? All it needed was last year regulations with proper screaming V10 engine, bio fuel if they please. No no. Lada cornering is what we get.
Yes, the teams will need some time to learn and optimise PU usage, and maybe they will tweak the regs on harvesting.
Yes, there is a danger that one team is ahead of the pack in this reg cycle.
However, "slow" through the corners is not all bad IMHO. They are slower because the cars have a lot less downforce. Drivers should no longer be able to just step on it and hold on through corners like Eau Rouge. They will be more on the edge, hopefully resulting in driver skill being a greater differentiator.
2025 cars were about 10 seconds faster than they were in the early 90's on many comparable tracks, were the cars rubbish to watch back then?
Also, due to lower DF, higher straight line speed, and lower mechanical grip from smaller contact patch, braking distances are longer. With longer braking zones, there is more scope for drivers to make moves under braking.
Do you know what time they were doing these runs? Might go back and watch as I’ve seen about 45mins of testingFittingMechanics wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 21:57Anyone who watched testing, especially the "power hour" when Norris, Leclerc, Verstappen were on quali runs cannot call these laps dull. They were exciting, on edge, cars have too much power at corner exit and move around, etc.
About 1h 30 minutes before the end of the session.chrisc90 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 00:13Do you know what time they were doing these runs? Might go back and watch as I’ve seen about 45mins of testingFittingMechanics wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 21:57Anyone who watched testing, especially the "power hour" when Norris, Leclerc, Verstappen were on quali runs cannot call these laps dull. They were exciting, on edge, cars have too much power at corner exit and move around, etc.
So? In F1 they didn't want NA, and wanted hybridisation. So, again I'm not wrong.TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 23:43Almost every manufacturer in F1 is running a V8 or V10 in other series.mzso wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:09TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 05:21
This is not true at all. WRC got rid of hybrid and used sustainable fuel in 2025. Ben Sulayem has a lot of power and he supports the idea. He has already chaired meetings about it. So you are just wrong.
If you got rid of the MGU-H, you might as well not have hybrids at all. It was the one thing that actually made hybrids functional in F1. Even going back to the 2014 configuration with an equal displacement V8 would be fine by me.I think it is/was little more than a populist exercise. IMO the chance for it actually happening is remote.
In F1 the manufacturers care about engine tech.
Ferrari, Audi , Ford , Mercedes and Aston Martin.
So again , you're wrong.
I don't think it was dull, but remember that Bahrain flatters the cars in terms of harvesting. AUS will be on the opposite end.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 21:57Anyone who watched testing, especially the "power hour" when Norris, Leclerc, Verstappen were on quali runs cannot call these laps dull. They were exciting, on edge, cars have too much power at corner exit and move around, etc.
That's almost frontrunning pace by the Audi !nitrotech wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:21Here are the race sims from today. Audi is impressive in the mid pack.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HBnKn3pXUAA ... name=large
My own calculations suggest that Audi is down about 25hp compared to the leading manufacturers. So they appear to have a very good chassis. Paddock is going to take note of their aero concept.erudite450 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2026, 07:39That's almost frontrunning pace by the Audi !nitrotech wrote: ↑20 Feb 2026, 19:21Here are the race sims from today. Audi is impressive in the mid pack.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HBnKn3pXUAA ... name=large

Supposed to be the same as the C3 but it's manufactured in the turkey plant. They're testing it to determine whether drivers/teams think it performs similarly to determine how feasible it is for the turkey plant to step in to manufacture for Pirelli if they ever need that capability