Mercedes W17

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Lasssept
104
Joined: 09 Feb 2024, 01:13

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Autoracer
Image

Image

Luscion
Luscion
129
Joined: 13 Feb 2023, 01:37

Re: Mercedes W17

Post


User avatar
SiLo
144
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Felipe Baby!

User avatar
Real PJ's Beard
5
Joined: 26 Dec 2017, 21:29

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
20 Feb 2026, 09:55
Something strange on the rear wing today (Test 2, Day 3)
https://i.postimg.cc/qRwMFqMw/image.png
https://i.postimg.cc/gkVXyz3x/image.png
They just look like mini gurney flaps, so they are probably seeing some problems with flow attachment at the two extremities of the rear wing
Dear God let this be the year

Brahmal
Brahmal
58
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Real PJ's Beard wrote:
20 Feb 2026, 14:56
They just look like mini gurney flaps, so they are probably seeing some problems with flow attachment at the two extremities of the rear wing
It looks like theres a small slot gap, and the incidence is similar to the wing section below. These would act more like an additional wing element rather than a gurney.

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

...and in one of the pictures, the end plate looks different

User avatar
hugobos
0
Joined: 30 Dec 2009, 11:01

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Could it be a sensor? It looks like there is a cable_wire in the turquoise square
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced

User avatar
Lasssept
104
Joined: 09 Feb 2024, 01:13

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Image

Image
nicolas carpentiers

User avatar
Lasssept
104
Joined: 09 Feb 2024, 01:13

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Image
nicolas carpentiers

User avatar
Y-250.A
0
Joined: 19 Feb 2024, 00:24

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Image
credit : @xavigazquez

User avatar
Lasssept
104
Joined: 09 Feb 2024, 01:13

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Image
Fabrega

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
187
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Still not sure how that addition to the rear wing is in the legality box. It looks like it's part of the rear wing endplate, but even still.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

SB15
SB15
7
Joined: 15 Feb 2025, 22:47

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Owen.C93 wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 14:46
Still not sure how that addition to the rear wing is in the legality box. It looks like it's part of the rear wing endplate, but even still.
If Ferrari can make an upside down wing, then that pretty much shows rear-wing development is wide open

Owen.C93
Owen.C93
187
Joined: 24 Jul 2010, 17:52

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

SB15 wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 14:59
Owen.C93 wrote:
05 Mar 2026, 14:46
Still not sure how that addition to the rear wing is in the legality box. It looks like it's part of the rear wing endplate, but even still.
If Ferrari can make an upside down wing, then that pretty much shows rear-wing development is wide open
Not really, no.
Motorsport Graduate in search of team experience ;)

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mercedes W17

Post

Teams can use a wing that flips over because the rear wing is no longer required to stay inside the regulation box when it moves between its two positions. There's nothing gray about it.

Merc's flick ups are definitely some kind of gray area. They are either using those parts as rear wing bracing (C3.11.3 ) or rear wing auxiliary components (C3.11.7). It is the loosest possible interpretation of those words. Typically, that stuff is excluded from the requirement to remain inside the regulation box.
Beware of T-Rex