Aston Martin AMR26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Ashwinv16
60
Joined: 15 Jul 2017, 12:04

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
21 Feb 2026, 16:54
Ashwinv16 wrote:
21 Feb 2026, 14:44
I heard about recent rumors about the last minute changes Honda made in January and this Pic confirms turbo is no longer in the V. It defiantly on the full back

https://x.com/k_kuruma16B/status/20248 ... 7/photo/1

https://x.com/carpentiers_f1/status/202 ... 17955?s=20
Honda did not move their turbo from the V to the back "in january". Stop spreading things that are not true.
Read the post, look at the picture on the link. Answer your own questions
Halo not as bad as we thought

User avatar
AR3-GP
560
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

Ashwinv16 wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 07:45
AR3-GP wrote:
21 Feb 2026, 16:54
Ashwinv16 wrote:
21 Feb 2026, 14:44
I heard about recent rumors about the last minute changes Honda made in January and this Pic confirms turbo is no longer in the V. It defiantly on the full back

https://x.com/k_kuruma16B/status/20248 ... 7/photo/1

https://x.com/carpentiers_f1/status/202 ... 17955?s=20
Honda did not move their turbo from the V to the back "in january". Stop spreading things that are not true.
Read the post, look at the picture on the link. Answer your own questions
There is no evidence that the turbo was in the V or that it is now out of the V. This picture doesn't show the engine. There's an intercooler and hosing which could be flowing in any direction. It wouldn't be possible for a manufacturer to make a significant architecture change and put a car on track in less than 30 days.
Beware of T-Rex

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

delsando53 wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 15:44
Its Ai, and hypothetical ,i thought i shared it as I delved into this, but be interested if anyone runs this on CFD? wouldn't want you quantify with with the claimed number but may see something interesting.
Site rules and intention are the car threads to be explicitly about the current and in place AMR26 vehicle that's running and visible to us all.

There maybe other thread for the theoretical approach.

vorticism
vorticism
443
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

They're using a continuous front control arm similar to what was used on RB16, RB18+

Image
Photo:NurPhoto
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

User avatar
FrukostScones
166
Joined: 25 May 2010, 17:41
Location: European Union

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

their whole car has a very "flashy" carbon fibre pattern (also the floor and diffuser), does anyone know what this is called. looks pricey.
I think atm the car might be slow but it looks gorgeous, shape everything. sry for little ot.
"I ain't with the FIFA, I'm in Tokyo." LH

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

FrukostScones wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 20:53
their whole car has a very "flashy" carbon fibre pattern (also the floor and diffuser), does anyone know what this is called. looks pricey.
I think atm the car might be slow but it looks gorgeous, shape everything. sry for little ot.
The pattern is about the performance of the material. Multi fine strand woven (a little like basket work) into pattern that give different resistance to load and stress according to how its orientated toward the load paths it has to accommodate. The more effective it is specified, then the less material needs to be used. Unsure if cost differs significantly for raw material change from one weave to another, much of the cost is going to be in the layup labour etc that also significantly impacts its performance potential.

Farnborough
Farnborough
139
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

vorticism wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 20:32
They're using a continuous front control arm similar to what was used on RB16, RB18+

https://i.postimg.cc/qvK1cL3Q/amr26longbow.jpg
Photo:NurPhoto
Good clear image of that component, as mentioned its been in other team designs recently too.

Possibly correct to assume that it is a spring component that is supplemented by the torsion bar used to produce a homogeneous "total" spring contribution in support.
The damping can't of course be achieved (well not to any great degree) and must be placed within pushrod internal destination within bellcrank area.

Andi76
Andi76
473
Joined: 03 Feb 2021, 20:19

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

Leon Kennedy wrote:
14 Feb 2026, 22:52
Guys, I found some really interesting things on x and I'll tell you my theory.

https://x.com/i/status/2022758881986838925

The fact is that they cover the frame when they start the engine without the nose cone.
If it's true that:
they cover the front area and only do it with the engine running, with the engine off and then something related to the hydraulic pressure changes state.
Engine running = hydraulic pressure
In the F1: The ICE puts pressure on the hydraulic system, infact the hydraulics govern:
gearbox
clutch
differential
power steering
and especially suspension systems.

The most plausible hypotheses:
3.Hydraulic preload system
When there is pressure, could stabilizes
and with the engine off, it is "soft"
2. Pitch control via interconnection and could try to limit height variations
3. Platform anti-stall system and maintains a constant floor height as load increases.

What do you think about this? For me it's a gray area.
The suggestion that Aston Martin might be using hydraulic pressure from the Power Unit to manipulate suspension states touches upon one of the most strictly policed boundaries in Formula 1.

Under the FIA 2026 Technical Regulations, specifically Article C10.2.4, any "powered device" capable of altering the configuration or affecting the performance of any part of the suspension system is strictly forbidden. While it is technically correct that the Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) drives the hydraulic pump—which in turn provides the necessary pressure for the gearbox, clutch, and power steering—the regulations create a hard wall between these essential functions and the car's sprung suspension.

​That they cover the front bulkhead when the engine is started without the nose cone likely points to the initialization of the car's complex passive systems rather than an active hydraulic preload. According to Article C10.2.2, the suspension of each axle must be independent and arranged so its response results only from changes in load applied directly to the wheels. A system that uses engine-driven hydraulic pressure to "stabilize" or "stiffen" the chassis upon startup would effectively constitute an active suspension, which is illegal.

Furthermore, any coupling between the suspension and other systems, such as steering or braking, is explicitly prohibited.
​What you perceive as a "gray area" is more likely the integration of highly sophisticated, yet passive, heave dampers and spring arrangements. These components often rely on high-pressure gas or fluid reservoirs to maintain the "platform" and prevent the floor from stalling at high speeds. When the engine is off and the system is not fully pressurized for a run, the car might appear "soft" or sit at a different height. However, once the car is in motion, Article C10.2.5 dictates that no adjustments can be made to any suspension system. The secrecy involving the covers is standard practice to hide the specific geometry of these inboard components—classified as Listed Team Components (LTC)—which define the car's aerodynamic stability.

​Ultimately, while the Power Unit does provide the energy for the hydraulic system, that energy is legally restricted to non-suspension functions. Any evidence that PU energy is being used to maintain a constant floor height or control pitch would be seen as a violation of the requirement that suspension must only respond to wheel loads. The "gray area" is thus not in the legality of the energy transfer itself, which is forbidden, but in how teams package passive, pressure-dependent components to mimic the stability of an active system without violating the ban on "powered" intervention.

User avatar
Gridlock
42
Joined: 27 Jan 2012, 04:14

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

delsando53 wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 13:49
Wondering if HONDA have thought about this ?Possible solutions for maximizing energy recovery ......

Camshaft-Optimized Low-Drag Engine Mode for Enhanced Regen Efficiency


Concept: Use advanced variable valve timing (VVT) on the camshaft
Maybe before posting 2000 words of AI slop check whether the very first thing you mention is banned?
#58

vorticism
vorticism
443
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

Farnborough wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 21:53
vorticism wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 20:32
They're using a continuous front control arm similar to what was used on RB16, RB18+

https://i.postimg.cc/qvK1cL3Q/amr26longbow.jpg
Photo:NurPhoto
Good clear image of that component, as mentioned its been in other team designs recently too.

Possibly correct to assume that it is a spring component that is supplemented by the torsion bar used to produce a homogeneous "total" spring contribution in support.
The damping can't of course be achieved (well not to any great degree) and must be placed within pushrod internal destination within bellcrank area.
Yes, it may act somewhat as a leaf spring, although the addition may be trivial. I had taken to calling it the longbow when I first became aware of it on the RB18, owing to it being almost the same dimensions thereof, then found it in photos of earlier RBR cars. In this specific application the unique feature seems to be that the arm anchor/pivot-point can be placed ahead of the bulkhead, inside the nosecone. It also would not trace a perfectly circular at its outboard end, being a bending beam, although, again, this might be trivial and consequential.

Who else is using it this year?
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
565
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

vorticism wrote:
23 Feb 2026, 00:42
Farnborough wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 21:53
vorticism wrote:
22 Feb 2026, 20:32
They're using a continuous front control arm similar to what was used on RB16, RB18+

https://i.postimg.cc/qvK1cL3Q/amr26longbow.jpg
Photo:NurPhoto
Good clear image of that component, as mentioned its been in other team designs recently too.

Possibly correct to assume that it is a spring component that is supplemented by the torsion bar used to produce a homogeneous "total" spring contribution in support.
The damping can't of course be achieved (well not to any great degree) and must be placed within pushrod internal destination within bellcrank area.
Yes, it may act somewhat as a leaf spring, although the addition may be trivial. I had taken to calling it the longbow when I first became aware of it on the RB18, owing to it being almost the same dimensions thereof, then found it in photos of earlier RBR cars. In this specific application the unique feature seems to be that the arm anchor/pivot-point can be placed ahead of the bulkhead, inside the nosecone. It also would not trace a perfectly circular at its outboard end, being a bending beam, although, again, this might be trivial and consequential.

Who else is using it this year?
I think it is for weight savings. It allows to spread the stresses acorss to the other side of the chassis so less reinforcement is required from the bulkhead. My guess at least.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

SSJ4
SSJ4
29
Joined: 04 Jul 2023, 23:59

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post



Is this similar to the 2015 scenario with the size zero concept?

vorticism
vorticism
443
Joined: 01 Mar 2022, 20:20
Location: YooEssay

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

The intercooler is fully ducted and the giant louvers dump most of the side radiator efflux, which helps. Partly why I advocated using the now-larger louver allowance last year. It allows narrower bodywork after them. What is objectively the best approach (conventional aft center cannon vs big louvers) is another matter.

vorticism wrote:
28 Jun 2025, 01:29
...
If more, or all, of a sidepod radiator's outflow is released through a louver area in the middle of the car, this will allow the cars to have narrower engine covers after that point, as the full-length internal ducting is reduced or no longer needed. Given the shorter wheelbases in 2026 and resulting shorter engine covers, I think the designers choose this path in order to improve the length:width ratio of the aft region of engine cover.
https://twitter.com/athalkunni/status/1 ... 6148342914
PlatinumZealot wrote:
23 Feb 2026, 01:16
vorticism wrote:
23 Feb 2026, 00:42
Yes, it may act somewhat as a leaf spring, although the addition may be trivial. I had taken to calling it the longbow when I first became aware of it on the RB18, owing to it being almost the same dimensions thereof, then found it in photos of earlier RBR cars. In this specific application the unique feature seems to be that the arm anchor/pivot-point can be placed ahead of the bulkhead, inside the nosecone. It also would not trace a perfectly circular at its outboard end, being a bending beam, although, again, this might be trivial and consequential.

Who else is using it this year?
I think it is for weight savings. It allows to spread the stresses acorss to the other side of the chassis so less reinforcement is required from the bulkhead. My guess at least.
Can't deny that, although any sort of brace or spar integral to the chassis could bridge two pivot points on either side of the monocoque.
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿

FNTC
FNTC
22
Joined: 03 Nov 2023, 21:27

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

SSJ4 wrote:
23 Feb 2026, 02:01


Is this similar to the 2015 scenario with the size zero concept?
I notice the panel with the big outlet and sometimes louvres is right above the turbocharger in the pic above. Under Maaden, before Honda logo.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
565
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Aston Martin AMR26

Post

The turbo charger is not visible any at all in the photo.

They are even smaller this year.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028