It is 100% true. What you have stated doesn't imply otherwise.CHT wrote: ↑24 Feb 2026, 05:34That is only partly true because there are 2 RPBT companies under RBPT.GhostF1 wrote: ↑24 Feb 2026, 05:24Just to put this to bed.SealTheRealDeal wrote: ↑24 Feb 2026, 04:40
Wasn't Honda's most important jump the one it made with the 2021 engine? Unless Ben Hodgkinson and RBPT can time travel they would have had precisely 0 to to with that.
RBPT had zero to do with the design of the PU whatsoever except for trackside maintenance, some battery work and just general chassis integration for ancillaries, cooling and external routing for the RBPTH001/2/3 used in the engine freeze years. The power unit IP remained with Honda and no one at RBPT had a single thing to do with the design of the engine.
RBPT Limited (partner with Honda) - Established since 2022
RBPT 2026 Limited (100% RB + Ford) - Established since 2023
You are correct in that there were effectively two RBPT entities. And neither had any input in the design of the Honda PU IP. Which was designed and manufactured solely by HRC Sakura. As I mentioned previously.. RBPT, in partnership with Honda MK, only provided trackside maintenance and chassis integration improvements during the engine freeze years. Nothing to do with the design, internals, combustion methods, any of that good stuff with the power unit, in the sense we are discussing, has or had anything to do with RBPT.
This needs hammering home, as so much misinformation is being spread as fact. Those peddling the alternative haven't actually done their research about the entire Red Bull/RBPT/Honda mess around 2021-2022 and honestly just expose themselves as AI peddlers and it is becoming tiring.

