.
Max is always telling the truth and you know that. When he moves his eyes in the same direction or rub his nose he is thinking if he will say a certain something or keep his mouth. But he is never lying.
.
Max is a straight forward guy who doesnot speak in riddles. But that does not mean that he always says all. Lets seeWouter wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 22:00.
Max is always telling the truth and you know that. When he moves his eyes in the same direction or rub his nose he is thinking if he will say a certain something or keep his mouth. But he is never lying.
I think you're referring to some members of McLaren and Mercedes who were in Bahrain for the Pirelli wet weather test. Afaik they were stuck there when airspace around them closed. They should have been able to get out via Saudi or Oman by now.
https://autoracer.it/leclerc-2026-oppor ... l-davanti/Despite the enthusiasm for the new technical cycle, Leclerc does not give in to easy proclamations, aware that winter tests often hide the real hierarchies: "The year of Ferrari? It would be a dream, but it is too early to make predictions, especially since we do not know the potential of our rivals. We don't know who is really in the lead at the moment. Mercedes, McLaren and Red Bull already seem well prepared and very competitive. I have the impression that the four teams that have recently competed for the championship are quite close, but Mercedes could have a slight advantage, and even Red Bull seems a little above."
This just seems like the "hot potato" year, no one wants to have any suspicion of strength over them whatsoever.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Mar 2026, 16:15I don't know what Leclerc sees in this car![]()
https://autoracer.it/leclerc-2026-oppor ... l-davanti/Despite the enthusiasm for the new technical cycle, Leclerc does not give in to easy proclamations, aware that winter tests often hide the real hierarchies: "The year of Ferrari? It would be a dream, but it is too early to make predictions, especially since we do not know the potential of our rivals. We don't know who is really in the lead at the moment. Mercedes, McLaren and Red Bull already seem well prepared and very competitive. I have the impression that the four teams that have recently competed for the championship are quite close, but Mercedes could have a slight advantage, and even Red Bull seems a little above."
Part of it is just "covering" in case they are missing something or in case RedBull have a lot up their sleeve compared to what they showed. From an outside perspective it's generally quite hard to properly evaluate RedBull to be fair. They never show anything in sessions that are not worth showing pace. But I am assuming the teams have access to better tools/data to better account for the sandbags.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Mar 2026, 16:15I don't know what Leclerc sees in this car![]()
https://autoracer.it/leclerc-2026-oppor ... l-davanti/Despite the enthusiasm for the new technical cycle, Leclerc does not give in to easy proclamations, aware that winter tests often hide the real hierarchies: "The year of Ferrari? It would be a dream, but it is too early to make predictions, especially since we do not know the potential of our rivals. We don't know who is really in the lead at the moment. Mercedes, McLaren and Red Bull already seem well prepared and very competitive. I have the impression that the four teams that have recently competed for the championship are quite close, but Mercedes could have a slight advantage, and even Red Bull seems a little above."
Quoting posts from @AR3-GP & yours truly from the Ferrari team thread,Emag wrote: ↑03 Mar 2026, 20:44Part of it is just "covering" in case they are missing something or in case RedBull have a lot up their sleeve compared to what they showed. From an outside perspective it's generally quite hard to properly evaluate RedBull to be fair. They never show anything in sessions that are not worth showing pace. But I am assuming the teams have access to better tools/data to better account for the sandbags.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Mar 2026, 16:15I don't know what Leclerc sees in this car![]()
https://autoracer.it/leclerc-2026-oppor ... l-davanti/Despite the enthusiasm for the new technical cycle, Leclerc does not give in to easy proclamations, aware that winter tests often hide the real hierarchies: "The year of Ferrari? It would be a dream, but it is too early to make predictions, especially since we do not know the potential of our rivals. We don't know who is really in the lead at the moment. Mercedes, McLaren and Red Bull already seem well prepared and very competitive. I have the impression that the four teams that have recently competed for the championship are quite close, but Mercedes could have a slight advantage, and even Red Bull seems a little above."
AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 Mar 2026, 14:16I think the data supports Ferrari using a higher power mode on that fast lap. I calculated the straight-line acceleration peaks for the night sessions and plotted this for the top 4 teams. It is unfortunately only using velocity data from the fastf1 api so a grain of salt might be needed. Anyway, the vertical axis is the peak longitudinal (straight-line) accel. It is more or less always occurring at the T10 exit.
![]()
Comments in no particular order:
(1) Ferrari were at the highest accel. level that they showed so far in a best lap (this does not capture any games they could have played on slow laps with higher acceleration levels. I didn't check that)
(2) Merc/RBR/McL are down a lot from their peaks when they did their push laps on the last day.
(3) Mclaren runs are closer to a hypothetical upper limit than Mercedes, since they exhibit consistently higher accelerations in the push laps whether that is due to fuel or power mode.
If this acceleration data can be estimated like this, I am sure the teams already have all this figured out, and drawn much better conclusions, rather than the 'hunches' above.venkyhere wrote: ↑03 Mar 2026, 16:31if I may add...
(4) the bottom-most blue dot from Redbull with 1:34:2 is a bit of an anomaly - it means they were either not deploying at the start of the back straight, or they had a heavy fuel load. This is a 'fast-lap' for sure, so that means they made-up in the straights. Launching from a slow corner exit into a long straight is the most 'optimal' way to deploy - maximum bang for buck/energy - using it for 'low drag penalty' longitudinal (rather than lateral) acceleration, rather than for 'high drag penalty' sustaining top speed. And if a car managed to sacrifice this and used the energy when there is high drag penalty, and still produce a laptime that isn't too far off; that can only mean that the car is very slippery. Or that everyone else is intentionally not deploying the full 4MJ quota.
Max is similar to Michael Schumacher in the sense that we will only hear him admit he was wrong in certain situations decades later. I'm sure if Michael was able now, he would admit more amongst some banter. Would have loved to seen him on some podcasts like with Eddie Jordan and David Coulthard.TNTHead wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 23:10Max is a straight forward guy who doesnot speak in riddles. But that does not mean that he always says all. Lets see