2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
Fred
Fred
1
Joined: 24 Jun 2023, 04:42

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 08:29
Judging by FP2, Mercedes and Ferrari will be the podium. Mclaren and Red Bull have more work to do.
I think you’re unfairly discounting McLaren here, and throughout testing really. They didn’t do a proper a race sim in FP2, so we don’t really know where they are, but the limited amount that they did do was competitive with Mercedes and Ferrari. The first FP2 session is also usually when you can first see who is it at the front based on the lap times of their qualy runs, particularly with the start of a new rule set. McLaren not only had equivalent lap times to the other 2, but they also set the fastest lap.

I’d even go so far as to say that they’ve looked good all through testing. They mightn’t have been as flashy or gotten the same media attention as Mercedes and Ferrari, but there also wasn’t anything to justify any claims that there was a gap between them and the other 2. So I’m not sure why you’ve been saying that throughout testing, especially since you haven’t shown what you’ve been referring to that’s repeatedly led you to this conclusion. I could be wrong and completely missing whatever you’re looking at, but I haven’t actually seen any evidence that says McLaren is off the pace, and after FP2 I’m seeing the opposite.

That’s not to say I’m expecting them to be the best, but I think it’s safe to say that it’d be surprising if they aren’t competitive with Mercedes and Ferrari. That is barring any reliability issues of course. We’ll have to see how Norris goes in FP3 and if he makes up the lost ground from effectively missing FP1, but Piastri should be in the fight here in my opinion, even if the Mercedes and/or Ferrari has a slight edge on him. I definitely don’t think a podium is outside of the question for him, and while I don’t think McLaren will be overtly disappointed if they don’t win, I do think they’ll be upset if they don’t at least come home with a podium.

Red Bull on the other hand I don’t think will be fighting for a podium. Their race sims have been slightly off, but what’s more telling is the gap in their qualy runs. With 3 other teams having a comfortable advantage, I don’t think they’ll be able to fight for a podium without a lot of luck going their way. I’m just not seeing the same thing at all in McLaren’s lap times.

User avatar
atanatizante
133
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 15:33

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

Some further data after FP2:

- LAPTIMES & TIRES USED FOR THE TOP 11 DRIVERS:

ImageImage

- LAPTIMES & TIRES USED FOR THE LAST 11 DRIVERS:

ImageImage

- SECTORS :

ImageImage

- SPEEDTRAPS :

ImageImage

- FP1 Top Speed Comparison, just to see how the teams are fine-tuning their deployments on the straights between the sessions, the main setup work was done, according to Anthony Davidson, Sky Sports F1 pundit :

Image
"I don`t have all the answers. Try Google!"
Jesus

User avatar
atanatizante
133
Joined: 10 Mar 2011, 15:33

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

search wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 14:09
atanatizante wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 14:05
For example, LEC used one set of soft tyres in both FP1 and FP2, so after the FP2 session, he should be listed with four new sets of softs and two used ones, don’t you think?
the rules require everyone to return two sets of tires after each pracice session (on normal weekends - sprint weekends are different). No matter how many sets the exact driver used in that session.

Leclerc started the weekend with 2xH, 3xM, 8xS. As visible on your charts, he used 1xS and 1xM in FP1 and 1xS and 1xH in FP2. Which means he has 1xH, 2xM and 6xS left now. The used ones are gone
Ok, my bad then, and thank you forthe clarification.
"I don`t have all the answers. Try Google!"
Jesus

michl420
michl420
25
Joined: 18 Apr 2010, 17:08
Location: Austria

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

Most cars are faster on the finish line than by speed trap as expected. I guess the max speed measurements are almost without any meaning this year.

User avatar
AR3-GP
550
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

michl420 wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 15:17
Most cars are faster on the finish line than by speed trap as expected. I guess the max speed measurements are almost without any meaning this year.
Max speed, sector times, and even the minimum corner speeds don't have much meaning this year. It's only the final laptime that can be used to make comparisons. Harvesting and deployment muddies everything.
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
Sergej
3
Joined: 09 Apr 2024, 19:00

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

this is quite disgusting

User avatar
RonMexico
0
Joined: 08 Jul 2020, 14:11

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

It's shaping up to be a bit all over the place.

I can't say I enjoy watching the cars onboards, the cars themselves look beautiful.

Stinker of a power unit formula.

User avatar
franbatista123
0
Joined: 19 Sep 2023, 19:45

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

Sergej wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 17:21
this is quite disgusting
They should just change the power split to 60/40 or similar. Regardless, Australia is probably going to be one of the worst tracks for recharging so at least we should reserve judgement for a few races.

User avatar
search
0
Joined: 19 Jul 2014, 21:20

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

Does the 107% rule still exist? Apparently Aston was running at high fuel today to limit the vibrations, but I honestly struggle to see for what reason they should get an exception from it if they turn out to miss it again tomorrow.

SB15
SB15
7
Joined: 15 Feb 2025, 22:47

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

franbatista123 wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 17:58
Sergej wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 17:21
this is quite disgusting
They should just change the power split to 60/40 or similar. Regardless, Australia is probably going to be one of the worst tracks for recharging so at least we should reserve judgement for a few races.
70/30 looks more reasonable.

BanMeToo
BanMeToo
6
Joined: 27 Dec 2013, 16:26
Location: USA

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

Yea 50/50 is wrong. Who thought this was a good idea.

User avatar
Jambier
5
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 11:02
Location: France

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

BanMeToo wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 18:22
Yea 50/50 is wrong. Who thought this was a good idea.
Stupid political decision as we can see in actual politics

f1isgood
f1isgood
5
Joined: 31 Oct 2022, 19:52
Location: Continental Europe

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

BanMeToo wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 18:22
Yea 50/50 is wrong. Who thought this was a good idea.
Road car makers.
The FIA folds on a royal flush.

User avatar
AR3-GP
550
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

The straightline mode should be activated right after T6 or T7.

Image
Beware of T-Rex

upsidedowntoast
upsidedowntoast
0
Joined: 10 Feb 2026, 20:38

Re: 2026 Australian Grand Prix - Melbourne, March 06 - 08

Post

Jambier wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 18:38
BanMeToo wrote:
06 Mar 2026, 18:22
Yea 50/50 is wrong. Who thought this was a good idea.
Stupid political decision as we can see in actual politics
It has the vibe of "green ideologue who can't do math" to me. And I generally support environmental causes.

They could have kept 50/50 if they also kept MGUH and front axle regen. The moment those two things got axed because of the teams, they should have shifted to 35% electric.