Yeah, I agree but to be fair, aside from Ferrari, Haas, Williams and Alpine, everybody was sandbagging, eventhough not as much as Mercedes. Racing Bulls is a lot better than indicated at testing and so is Audi, to an extent.
Yeah, I agree but to be fair, aside from Ferrari, Haas, Williams and Alpine, everybody was sandbagging, eventhough not as much as Mercedes. Racing Bulls is a lot better than indicated at testing and so is Audi, to an extent.
I was chatting to a couple of Cadillac staff last night during the 7pm pit-lane walk, and they said they've had a lot of technical issues this weekend. They just weren't bad enough to stop them from running the cars.avantman wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 09:06Bottas sounded satisfied on the radio, nothing suggests there was an issue. Not sure why people surprised, I always expected Perez to prove his superiority in that pair.Artur Craft wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 08:59Probably Ferrari was pushing way too hard on testing and FP and tricked Mercedes to show more than needed. I´m sure they will recalibrate that for the next GPExactly. Ferrari appeared to be a tough competitor and that fooled Mercedes into showing more than needed.
Btw, Perez destroyed Bottas. Was there any problem with Valteri´s car ?
Dude, please. That's an unsafe amount of copium. Max probably would have gone 0.2 faster than Hadjar. Max cannot bend the laws of physics. Albert Park is a power-centric track, and any PU advantages will massively govern laptimes differences. If this is the case in Albert Park, imagine tracks like Spa/Monza etc - it will be slaughter.pantherxxx wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 08:36Max could still have been on pole. It's not out of place for him to be 8 tenths faster than teammate. So season is not over yet.
Don't you see what is happening at end of long curved backstraight and on the next straight (Russell vs Hadjar)?Badger wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 08:54There are no 20 kph power advantages or whatever these analysts are smoking. It's Merc's chassis that is making the difference here.
https://i.postimg.cc/DzsfKNCs/speed(1).png
https://i.postimg.cc/66bkY0cJ/speed(2).png
It's nowhere near 20 kph, the trace says it's about 6 kph down to T11. At the end of the curved straight it's less than that except for that little artefact where Russell's trace goes horizontal, that's just a bug. And there are other parts of the circuit where Hadjar has a similar advantage (start and end of lap). The Merc engine may have a marginal power advantage, but the RBPT is not far behind. Most of Merc's speed comes from great aero and efficiency. If you can carry 10 kph more onto the straight you don't need as much deployment to accelerate to top speed.inox wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 10:05Don't you see what is happening at end of long curved backstraight and on the next straight (Merc vs Red Bull)?Badger wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 08:54There are no 20 kph power advantages or whatever these analysts are smoking. It's Merc's chassis that is making the difference here.
https://i.postimg.cc/DzsfKNCs/speed(1).png
https://i.postimg.cc/66bkY0cJ/speed(2).png
Red Bull runs out of juice and speed difference is indeed exceeding 20 km/h approaching the turn 9.
Yeah max is not going to be heads and shoulders faster than hadjar yet. By race 5 or 6 though I expect the gap to be similar to past teammates. Montoya was talking about it. It’s only a matter of time until they give max his toys on this car and his teammate can no longer drive the car. But it’s good to know hadjar is capable of p3 before they start rigging things. Watch he won’t make q3 after the summer break.venkyhere wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 09:36Dude, please. That's an unsafe amount of copium. Max probably would have gone 0.2 faster than Hadjar. Max cannot bend the laws of physics. Albert Park is a power-centric track, and any PU advantages will massively govern laptimes differences. If this is the case in Albert Park, imagine tracks like Spa/Monza etc - it will be slaughter.pantherxxx wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 08:36Max could still have been on pole. It's not out of place for him to be 8 tenths faster than teammate. So season is not over yet.
Driver skillset as we are used to, in the braking and cornering phases during a stint or a push lap is primarily gone with these regulations. I am not sure what they're testing anymore really.inox wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 10:48The major problem with these rules is that marginally better efficiency in certain area has exponential effects. The good point is that a big gap in lap time may be reduced more easily.
But as it is now, overtakes will happen while both cars are harvesting energy on the straight and has nothing to do with driver skill.