Also bear in mind: (1) they lost P3 (best non-Mercedes) due to the deployment issue (2) this isn’t a good track for the small turbo philosophy (not enough slow corners).Luscion wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 17:08They were the closest team to Merc in fp3, in quali Ham(on mediums) was the leading car behind the merc, 6 tenths away from Russell( on softs) in Q1, then their battery decided it didnt want to behave and they lost a ton of time. Despite all their issues Leclerc is still very close to Hadjar in p3 and Lewis is still close to both Mclarens. Are they definitively the 2nd fastest team? who knows, but they have a lot more pace than they were able to show in Q2 onwardsXyz22 wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 17:03How do you know it's the second best car?sucof wrote: ↑07 Mar 2026, 17:01People, calm down, and stop this negativity.
Fred and Ferrari did a great job. Having the second best car is awesome.
Even better, their car might be the best not counting the Merc power advantage.
I am proud of Ferrari, and the season is very very long.
If you are a fan, then support your team. If you are not supporting then please stop the trolling and negativity. Thanks.
It depends how much better the optimal lap time would have been, presuming proper deployment. If it cost them 3-4 tenths, then I feel a bit better and have a bit of hope for other types of tracks. If it’s 1-2 tenths, it’ll be a long year…

