Ok you have a great point…
Maybe you are correct but then Charles should have decided to pit under virtual safety car or his strategy team…
Ok you have a great point…
It wasn't that simple. The first VSC was too early and staying out was the right option.MB_Racer wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 11:12Ok you have a great point…
Maybe you are correct but then Charles should have decided to pit under virtual safety car or his strategy team…
Mercs stopped at the 1st VSC and went to the end right? It's moot anyway. They were too quick. Even though Russell made a hash of the first stint, they were always going to win.
I'm not sure how everyone except Mercedes will fail to qualify for ADUO when they apparently showed a 50+ hp advantage in quali yesterday, though I'm sure Merc will now go into hiding and avoid showing all the power in subsequent rounds
I think he was hinting at suspension set up. Wing setup, given active aero that nearly nulls drag induced by flaps over any significant straight, is not anymore a major trade off.GrizzleBoy wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 10:28Too much wing, possibly.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 09:43Leclerc said they messed up on the setup and something went wrong, but it's not immediately clear what from the data
Considering Ferrari made all their gains in corners, maybe they were losing too much in terms of efficiency over a whole lap by to using too much power to get the car up to speed on the straights.
Were you watching the same race as I did?Badger wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 12:20Russell had a massive lock-up in the first stint trying to pass Leclerc into turn 1, after that he got a big vibration and came on the radio complaining about the tyre. Soon after that the VSC came. In other words, Ferrari screwed up by not pitting Leclerc on that first VSC. Russell would not have been able to go long. They fell asleep on the pit wall, per usual.
I don't know if Ferrari can do something with their very small turbo (according to reports). It will help in some tracks but overall it's likely that MB concept is superior.
I was paying more attention than you apparently. They made a mistake by not pitting Leclerc under the VSC. Russell had to take that pit stop due to his massive flat spot, going long was not an option for him on that set. It doesn't mean Leclerc would have won the race, Russell would probably have passed him.But he would have had the opportunity to defend, instead they just lost it on strategy.F1NAC wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 12:32Were you watching the same race as I did?Badger wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 12:20Russell had a massive lock-up in the first stint trying to pass Leclerc into turn 1, after that he got a big vibration and came on the radio complaining about the tyre. Soon after that the VSC came. In other words, Ferrari screwed up by not pitting Leclerc on that first VSC. Russell would not have been able to go long. They fell asleep on the pit wall, per usual.
Leclerc on 14 laps younger tyres couldn’t close the gap to Antonelli. Russell was just cruising in the lead. Had they pitted, merc would have probably stayed out or eventually passed leclerc with stronger race pace.
P3 is the most they could get.
How do they measure the percentage though? Merc can sandbag all they like but the customers wont be. If its obvious the merc engine is the best from their telemetry will ADUO still be triggered?ryaan2904 wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 10:48Knowing this, i think its great that Ferrari are focusing on chassis upgrades. Even matching mercs in terms of pace forces merc to use more power. If they use more power others qualify for ADUO. A good chassis is a win winAR3-GP wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 10:40Combustion engine performance delta between 2% and 4% can introduce 1 extra PU homologation in 2026, and 1 extra PU homologation in 2027. So across 2026 and 2027 they would be able to introduce 3 new PU homologations (2026 in-season upgrade, 2027 launch spec, 2027 in-season upgrade).
If the ICE delta is greater than 4%, they get 2 in-season upgrades in both '26 and '27.