Largely because of incompetence from George. He lost the start and then cruised by Leclerc after a few laps. Then for some reason once he had established a one second gap he pressed the derate button on the back straight (losing like 20 kph), he lost so much time that by the time they got to T9 Leclerc cruised around the outside. He basically made a mistake (being too eager to top up the pack) which invited Leclerc back into the fight and that's why we got the show we got. It wasn't because of the cars.DGP123 wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 12:15Yeah, first half was good, but the second half of the race was a disaster. It’s a bit gimmicky with these power struggle antics of overtaking & defending, but at least there was some action & no drs trains. Graphics on deployment and battery life need improving.
Shame about the Merc advantage, but there are positives to take. It’s certainly not the write off people were painting after Q.
Pfff... Nope. Don't make lame excuses for them. They could, and should have taken advantage of the VSC like everyone else. Especially after Mercedes already did. That was the only logical and safest thing to do. Keep them behind and don't allow them to go fast and enjoy any pace advantage. Hold out while they eat up their tires, then settle down.ChrisM40 wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 12:24Ferrari weren’t ever winning this regardless of strategy, their only chance was doing what they did. Merc are clearly faster, then Ferrari, then McLaren/RB.
I suspect McLaren will out develop RB and be clear third or second by the summer break. The car seems advanced but in an early iteration. I dont think RB have said what happened to Hadjar, but it didnt sound like ICE failure, he lost drive.
I quite enjoyed the race honestly.
And now complete:hollus wrote: ↑01 Mar 2026, 14:15Awesome!
I want to lay alternative markers for immature cars at the beginning of the last regulation cycle. In 2022 Malbourne was the 3rd race, so the cars were a bit less green, but 1st race, 3rd race... same same enough.
Pole lap in 2022: 1:17:868 by Leclerc.
Fastest lap in the race: 1:20:268 by Leclerc.
In my opinion, Melbourne 2025 should be compared to Melbourne 2029 or at least 2028, after everyone has had 2 cycles of re-designing their cars including the successful tricks from the other teams.
Wow, this post looks even more stupid now - as expected.Chuckjr wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 02:43Not so much. Red Bull is second fastest. Premier #1 driver Leclerc and has-been Lewis just got out qualified by a first year at Red Bull driver, Hadjar. Go ahead and blame deployment, blame this, that, and the other circumstance. Keep living in denial. Next race Max will also out qualify Leclerc even with proper deployment. Watch. Ferrari fans are living in denial right now of what is actually happening. It is what it is.LM10 wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 01:36This comparison is useless as RedBull is not the second fastest car out there, but Ferrari is. If not for deployment issues which Ferrari had from Q2 on, they would have easily finished as second fastest.
Ferrari in Q2 was faster than Mercedes in all corners as can be seen on telemetry data and was hugely losing out on the straights relative to Mercedes.
Crying like a baby for a completely normal move by Leclerc - despite sitting in a hugely overpowered car on top of that - is not the best thing to do in the first laps of the first race.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 07:51Jesus there's even more Russell haters than Norris haters in here
Well, there is a reason that no one likes Russel. He is the most dishonest person on the grid.LM10 wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 13:34Crying like a baby for a completely normal move by Leclerc - despite sitting in a hugely overpowered car on top of that - is not the best thing to do in the first laps of the first race.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑08 Mar 2026, 07:51Jesus there's even more Russell haters than Norris haters in here