Also what's with the backwards facing camera below allwyn? Doesn't look like the normal winglet cam
And the shape of the entire engine cover looks much more concave and tighter than testing?
BigBeansBoy wrote: ↑05 Mar 2026, 15:421. Is the standard part from the FIA so it can’t have changedDe Wet wrote: ↑05 Mar 2026, 14:57https://i.ibb.co/G4sb5wWQ/image.jpg
Changes I have noticed. Looks like the Beam Wing (4) has a lower angle.

It would be interesting to look in the telemetry to see how top speed is affected, but then we won't know if it's just different deployment.SilviuAgo wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 17:28Piastri and Norris with a different rear wing design, flow-vis for Norris' wing
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HCuWpz4XIAA ... name=large
Oscar was generally higher most of the laps I checked but not sure if it was a case of Lando running more conservatively.AR3-GP wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 20:08It would be interesting to look in the telemetry to see how top speed is affected, but then we won't know if it's just different deployment.SilviuAgo wrote: ↑06 Mar 2026, 17:28Piastri and Norris with a different rear wing design, flow-vis for Norris' wing
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HCuWpz4XIAA ... name=large
That’s the mandated part of the nose that’s meant to crumble I think. The actual crash structure is rearwards of it.