f1isgood wrote: ↑10 Mar 2026, 00:32
CjC wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 23:54
f1isgood wrote: ↑09 Mar 2026, 21:36
Red Bull and Mercedes went neck to neck in 2021. The WCC could have swung the other way if not for unfortunate incidents on the track. I hope you are not being intentionally disingenuous here.
I think it's actually pretty surprising really that McLaren chassis is worse than what I expected. I obviously expected them to be at least as good as Mercedes.
Granted, there could be a much bigger snowball effect here because of Mercedes playing games with their customers.
McLaren had the constructors done by race 10 last year and had shifted all resources to 2026 by their own admission as they wanted to "keep winning in the future" and that's why they didn't bring late season upgrades (they couldn't find extra lap time either but anyways this was the official company line).
I just think Emag's theory checks out. Something must have gone wrong or what I am seeing doesn't make sense.
No i’m not, are you?
Merc came out on top in 2021 so would have been handicapped by the ATR through 21, effecting development for 22.
https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... jbNRbdYx8a
Did Red Bull ever lead the WCC for a significant period during that season to handicap their ATR? I can’t remember.
As Basti said and I agreed, Merc looks like it has a significant cooling advantage over McLaren as well. Another works team perk at the beginning of a new regulation set.
Comparing McLaren and Red Bull now is it no surprise that they are adrift of Merc and Ferrari. McLaren had the highest ATR handicap, Red Bull could have spent the same amount of allowance on the 26 car as McLaren did and the extra allowance they had over McLaren they spent on developing the 25 car to get Max in the fight?
Red Bull were the WCC leaders going into July 2021. My original post already addresses this. Both Mercedes and Red Bull had equal resources.
Red Bull's technical team got shown up by McLaren's team the last couple of years. After all, they are not the behemoth they were a couple of years ago given the staff attrition. I am not surprised Red Bull aren't at the top. McLaren were expected to be at the top as far as I was concerned. To me ATR is a bad excuse. Something went wrong somewhere.
Lastly, Mclaren did switch off 2025 development rather early, it was a concern that they couldn’t find much more lap time back then and it’s disappointing that there aren’t better now.
Yes, all I am saying is I expected more of McLaren. You can give many theories as to why they are bad but reality is they should be better than Mercedes from a chassis perspective if you had normal expectations going into this year. Sure, with the benefit of hindsight and Mercedes not giving their customers equal PUs is a big surprise but that still doesn't mean McLaren's chassis is right now good.
I am not sure Stella wanted to start this year behind as he naturally wanted to keep winning titles.
Why would anyone expect McLaren to be “better than Mercedes”?… You say that having less ATR is an excuse, but in reality is the biggest handicap you can give a team (it is absurd that there is ATR when there is a regulation change, even worst when it’s such a big change as the one in 2026).
Mercedes had more CFD / Wind Tunnel hours
Mercedes wasn’t fighting for a WCC or WDC
Mercedes as a works Team was always going to have an slight advantage at the beginning of a regulation change when it comes to integration of PU with Chassis (beyond potential advantage regarding deployment / harvesting strategies that are unique to this regulation change)
It shouldn’t surprise anyone that Mercedes is having a very strong start to the season and that is ahed of McLaren