f1Follower wrote: ↑10 Mar 2026, 13:59I was wondering how much did it cost Mercedes team for Kimi Antonelli shunt in FP3?
f1Follower wrote: ↑10 Mar 2026, 13:59I was wondering how much did it cost Mercedes team for Kimi Antonelli shunt in FP3?
I literally asked it 2 posts up
No one has any idea, but here's some gossip I heard so take it with a bag of salt.
Can there be the case where Mercedes has 2 engine with different engine mapping? One with aggressive engine and another with conservative one. This is to ensure when it's power centric circuit then it will be using aggressive engine map.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 03:24No one has any idea, but here's some gossip I heard so take it with a bag of salt.
Basically, once you take your new engine or battery or whatever, it's yours and you can keep using it for the rest of the year. And you can swap it in and out with whatever you like.
So it's possible Mercedes have decided to grab both battery/engine allocations now and swap them in/out all year.
By the way if you go over your engine allocation and take a third one (with the associated grid drop penalty) you once again can keep using that engine for the rest of the season or any of the prior two that you've already taken, whenever you want. Teams have strategically taken the third engine allocation on weekends where they've qualified poorly so that the penalty won't affect them as much anyway.
It's for cost reasons iirc. Back in the day they'd just have an engine blow up every other race. Which is funny and exciting but also adds up real quick.erudite450 wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 07:31Allocating only two ES is too small. The sport's overemphasis on reliability is not a good thing.
There's a guy on the F1 subreddit who used to prepare this destructor's championship. I think he signed off at the end of last season. I hope someone else takes up the thankless task.Lasssept wrote: ↑10 Mar 2026, 14:17f1Follower wrote: ↑10 Mar 2026, 13:59I was wondering how much did it cost Mercedes team for Kimi Antonelli shunt in FP3?![]()
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HC50qV_aoAA ... name=large
I understand but two is still too restrictive in my opinion. At the start of a new formula like now, I would give the teams more leeway to push the limits of technology and slowly limit the components after a year or two.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 07:33It's for cost reasons iirc. Back in the day they'd just have an engine blow up every other race. Which is funny and exciting but also adds up real quick.erudite450 wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 07:31Allocating only two ES is too small. The sport's overemphasis on reliability is not a good thing.
Respect to Audi on their engine and its reliabilityLasssept wrote: ↑10 Mar 2026, 14:17f1Follower wrote: ↑10 Mar 2026, 13:59I was wondering how much did it cost Mercedes team for Kimi Antonelli shunt in FP3?![]()
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HC50qV_aoAA ... name=large
Well Kimi didn't do it so it seems unlikely to be strategic.upsidedowntoast wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 03:24No one has any idea, but here's some gossip I heard so take it with a bag of salt.
Basically, once you take your new engine or battery or whatever, it's yours and you can keep using it for the rest of the year. And you can swap it in and out with whatever you like.
So it's possible Mercedes have decided to grab both battery/engine allocations now and swap them in/out all year.
By the way if you go over your engine allocation and take a third one (with the associated grid drop penalty) you once again can keep using that engine for the rest of the season or any of the prior two that you've already taken, whenever you want. Teams have strategically taken the third engine allocation on weekends where they've qualified poorly so that the penalty won't affect them as much anyway.