mzso wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 16:17
diffuser wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 15:37
Newey said that, based on Honda's admission, they weren't going to meet their own power targets. However, I don't know how those targets align with the targets of the other PU manufacturers, or whether those manufacturers met their own targets.
He also
said that "it's clear that a very large step in combustion engine power is needed for 27". Meaning whatever they can achieve next year won't near be enough. So that's not encouraging.
diffuser wrote: ↑11 Mar 2026, 15:37
The compression ratio (CR) and combustion issues were problems all teams were facing. It's related to the fuel and CR restrictions. The rollback of the CR regulation must have had an effect on Mercedes' power.
Even though the new regulation will not be enforced until June, they can't change the ICE between now and then. That means they had to make a change to meet the 16:1 CR at 130°C before the season began.
Since the decision was made very recently. I don't think anything has changed. I'm also doubtful that the 130°C test will have any notable effect. Maybe that's why they agreed so easily. They might not need to change anything or only tweak the material used slightly. (Assuming the trick actually exists an it's not just a media hoax)
How high are the temperatures of cylinder walls are expected to be? I would think several hundred Celsius at least.
I don't know what regulations apply. But it would be very surprising that if the FIA would force a reg change and then wouldn't allow the manufacturers to modify the engine to become legal to those. Forcing them to use the freshly illegal engine just to get disqualified all the time or not race at all is a ridiculous scenario, even for the FIA.
The only reason for testing at 130°C is because metal expands from ambient temperature. The thinking is that someone may have found a way to exaggerate expansion in specific areas to increase the compression ratio (CR) beyond the 16:1 limit. They haven’t said yet exactly how they will test this, so I think the May 31st date gives them time to finalize the testing procedure.
You are correct. I think Mercedes could build the same homologated parts with slightly different clearances:
- piston deck height
- head gasket tolerance
- piston crown machining tolerance
This would slightly increase the clearance volume, reducing CR. So maybe they are benefiting from an increased CR right now—at least until June.
By the way, Mercedes didn’t exactly comply easily. Since the vote didn’t require Mercedes’ approval to pass, what would have been the point of them opposing it? Remember, the vote requires something like four manufacturers, the FIA, and Liberty to approve it. I also think the manufacturers already knew what the regulation change would be before it was published—they did vote on it, after all.
I’m not sure how to use the statement “it’s clear that a very large step in combustion engine power is needed for ’27” to compare it to other ICEs. I'd be surprised that other PU manufacturers wouldn't just say the same thing. It doesn’t change the fact that we still have to wait and see:
1 - What the ICE will be like when it reaches the level it should have been at on day one.
2 - If it’s still low, whether they qualify for ADIO and how much they would receive.
3 - Since they’re spending so many resources on solving the vibration issues, are they doing anything on combustion performance in parallel? Will there even be a point for Honda to release a new homologation of the ICE?