the EDGE wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026, 11:04
FittingMechanics wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026, 10:56
mzso wrote: ↑17 Mar 2026, 01:22
It's many times better than the crap we had before 2022 for decades. And overtakes do happen. The problem is that there are too many gaps in performance. Ferrari is too weak compared to Mercedes. And behind Ferrari there's also a big gap.
If we had smaller gaps the racing would be really great. Even right now the racing is pretty good, especially in earlier parts of the races. I'm hoping that the teams close the gap before the aero development makes following close too hard.
Totally disagree.
Racing today is far worst than when DRS was at its worst. Formula One should be about skill, no state of charge
You are free to have that opinion.
Formula 1 is about finishing a race ahead of everyone else, usually this means in shortest time possible. To do that, you need a car capable of doing it and you (as a driver) need skill to execute. Both of these still apply, even though the way in which your skill is needed is different.
DRS is much worse as it is effectively "rubberbanding" the car behind to the car ahead. It is artificial, has no downside and is hard to tune. These rules would be good for overtaking even without "overtake mode". In fact, I bet that we'd see majority of these battles even if overtake mode didn't exist. My view is that these overtakes happen because the cars can choose to be fast in different areas of the track, so you are able to create overlaps where none existed before.
Overtake mode is similar to DRS in that it gives an advantage to the car behind but unlike DRS, overtake mode is not free. To use it you need to recharge more, which means you need to slow down somewhere. I would love to have proper data from the race to see whether the teams really use the extra recharging allowance from the overtake mode.