Hadjar can have his 5 seconds of fame in qualifying. Max will eat in him in the race. In china Hadjar was absolutely nowhere in race trim even though he was close in quali, I predict similar thing will happen here.
How so? The fuel that they don't burn to charge the battery can be used for other purposes. So how would it lead to more lift and coast?bananapeel23 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 15:25It would not help at all. It would just create even more lift and coast.
yeah, I think so too, but it's not like Verstappen scoring points is a given either. That car is just slow, and going by China, even more so in the race.
He dropped to the back in China, got screwed by a safety car, and still ended up running P6 on the road before his retirement... Do people have no memory of 2015? I know folks are chomping at the bit to write off Max Verstappen, but that'll usually bite you in the rear.
They can burn as much fuel as they want, as long as the instantaneous energy flow rate never exceeds 3000 MJ/h (~70kg/hr) at full throttle. They can start the race with as much fuel as they like.TimW wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 15:36How so? The fuel that they don't burn to charge the battery can be used for other purposes. So how would it lead to more lift and coast?bananapeel23 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 15:25It would not help at all. It would just create even more lift and coast.
PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 16:18I think the Audi engine is stronger than the RedBull Engine.

https://www.auto-motor-und-sport.de/for ... hrbarkeit/Is Audi allowed to retrofit the engine?
The engineers have also identified a deficit in general engine power. Mattia Binotto is already in contact with the FIA to make upgrades to the hardware via the so-called ADOU procedure. According to the regulations, teams that lack more than two percent combustion engine power are given the opportunity to retrofit during the season.
yeah, well, I saw the race. Gasly and Bearman on the same strategy were faster when Verstappen retired, both McLaren DNS'ed, and everyone starting on hards was screwed by the SC.AR3-GP wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 16:10He dropped to the back in China, got screwed by a safety car, and still ended up running P6 on the road before his retirement... Do people have no memory of 2015? I know folks are chomping at the bit to write off Max Verstappen, but that'll usually bite you in the rear.
Watching the outboard shots there is no way you can tell what is happening in the PU deployments. The cars look fast, nimble and twitch a lot more than the ground effect barges -certainly more entertaining to watch! I think certain fanbases are just bitter because their teams are under-performing.
Agreed. I think this will cement his legacy if he can win a race or two by end of year or even go for championship in 2027.purestpurist wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 12:00Max is running experimental setups and sacrificing his own performance to help the team. Getting outqualified in this way demonstrates his commitment and even his character, and when his teammate lucks into a race win later this year and Red Bull improves from p4 to p3 in the constructors standings next year, Max will deserve all the credit, for none of it would have been possible if he had not so generously run experimental setups
Yeah I always hate it how heavy my phone is after charging.venkyhere wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 12:29Btw, got to know how much David Croft understands the regs. At the beginning of Q, he was telling Button "they have reduced the battery charge to 8MJ for quali, the extra 0.5MJ would have made the car too heavy" , to which Button said something (don't remember exactly) as if he was agreeing to it.
Sky is pathetic. The commentators don't understand the 'bottom basics' about the formula and are just using a word salad with random use of terms like 'recharge/deploy/clipping' etc ; seemingly not even having made an attempt to ask someone to explain what MJ means, what KW means etc. If anyone has contacts in Sky, please forward this message or the clip from telecast, to the bosses in charge of 'content'. Pathetic is the only word to describe Croft.
The super-clipping is because, for a limited engine power output, the battery energy over the lap is insufficient to go balls to the wall, so you have to ration battery deployment to get the best lap time. Ergo, it stands that if you didn't have to ration electrical energy, there would be no super-clipping.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 16:21They can burn as much fuel as they want, as long as the instantaneous energy flow rate never exceeds 3000 MJ/h (~70kg/hr) at full throttle. They can start the race with as much fuel as they like.TimW wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 15:36How so? The fuel that they don't burn to charge the battery can be used for other purposes. So how would it lead to more lift and coast?bananapeel23 wrote: ↑28 Mar 2026, 15:25
It would not help at all. It would just create even more lift and coast.
Since the energy flow rate is capped, they can’t simply avoid fuel burning and inject the fuel into the ICE instead.
The alternative to super clipping is lifting and coasting.
Though I think that theoretically, banning super clipping or severely limiting it would be good. You could achieve what you are talking about by simply raising the fuel flow limit and banning or severely restricting super clipping.
But frankly these regulations are so undercooked that it’s going to be hard to get the drivers to push fully pretty much no matter what as long as the harvesting limits are as high as they are. Baku is the only track where the 8.5 MJ harvesting allowance makes sense, and is the only track where it could work without any LiCo or super clipping. But in the case of Baku the battery is too small, meaning that they will avoid harvesting under braking to be able to super clip on the straight, since otherwise the battery wouldn’t last for the turn 2-3 straight.