The real problem is not safety. Problem is such advantage in terms of terminal velocity in the fight for position has nothing to do with competitive racing and motorsport. Such overtakes become completely meaningless, look horrible, uninspiring, frankly depressing.AR3-GP wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 14:23The problem imo is that +50km/h speed differentials (or more with sudden superclipping) seems a bit dangerous to "normalize". This is real life, not the safety of a virtual video game where we slingshot the drivers at one another like missiles because of an overtake button and derating because more kids think it's fun. There is no re-spawn button in F1. You crash and drivers get hurt. Oliver Bearman sustained a 50G accident because of the cartoonish difference in speeds.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 12:11I fully agree. The good part in this regulation is the fact you can be tactical with energy use allowing you to become faster in various parts of the circuit. This allows drivers to open up opportunities to fight.
A driver pushes the overtake button and doesn't know how many cars he could slingshot past by the end of the straight. This isn't real life, it is need for speed racing. It doesn't have a place in the pinnacle of motorsport imo. People have to have respect for motorsport and what these drivers do. Just because you can turn it to mario kart level antics in order to tickle our most juvenile sensibilities doesn't mean that you should. I am not going to say this race was "boring" because it wasn't. It was something else which made it interesting, but it shouldn't be Formula 1 in my opinion.
There are only 22 cars. The odds that a handful of cars have engine failure and recreate these closing speeds repeatedly in a lap, over multiple laps is very low.
The problem is there is often only one area where you can use that extra energy to manage a pass. In Japan it was on the start/finish straight. Doing it earlier like Max once tried did not work.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 12:11I fully agree. The good part in this regulation is the fact you can be tactical with energy use allowing you to become faster in various parts of the circuit. This allows drivers to open up opportunities to fight.
Give as any example of such dangerous accidents happening before in formula 1, due to sudden ice or transmission failure. I would be satisfied with one single example.
You won't get 50 km/h+ closing speeds if superclipping is banned or highly restricted. Energy management will end up looking more sensible.AR3-GP wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 14:23The problem imo is that +50km/h speed differentials (or more with sudden superclipping) seems a bit dangerous to "normalize". This is real life, not the safety of a virtual game where we slingshot the drivers at one another like missiles because of an overtake button and derating because more kids think it's fun. There is no re-spawn button in F1. You crash and drivers get hurt. Oliver Bearman sustained a 50G accident because of the cartoonish difference in speeds.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 12:11I fully agree. The good part in this regulation is the fact you can be tactical with energy use allowing you to become faster in various parts of the circuit. This allows drivers to open up opportunities to fight.
I'd use caution in changing anything. It can easily devolve into centipede racing if they mess around too much with regen and deployments.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 11:57I mean energy management can absolutely be considered pure racing. It’s certainly wheel to wheel and strategic, but it’s not full pushing in the traditional sense. I understand why people don’t enjoy it, and I’m certainly no fan of the awful PU they are stuck with, but it’s not like the drivers aren’t making massive efforts to pass and stay ahead just because the PU sucks and forces them to not push in certain corners.gandharva wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 11:48Yeah. "Pure racing" it is. According to Toto. Btw. I want his drugs.bananapeel23 wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 11:45I’m still of the opinion that the racing is very interesting, even if I’d prefer it if there was no super clipping and the cars were a bit less energy starved. I don’t mind the pass and re-pass type of racing at all, I think it’s pretty fun.
https://streamable.com/vejtse
Again, I don’t mind drivers having to manage energy and being punished for doing it sloppily, like Russell. I do mind how awful it is to see cars slow down and downshift on full throttle, however. Those are two different things, though.
I don’t think the cars would race much different with no superclipping, they would just be slower. If they didn’t superclip, the yoyo racing would be considered a good thing.
Toto has not shied away from criticizing these engines either. He has mostly criticized how they act in quali, but pretty much the entire paddock agrees that they suck, including Merc higher-ups and drivers.
Webber and Kovalainen in Valencia 2010 was pretty dangerous, and that was due to a crazy quick closing speed.
+1 This is just another year in F1...it evolves...it will come around...it will be better for having gone through this. And without sounding derogatory or taking a jab at anyone I don't understand how people claim to know what "real racing" is from behind a keyboard unless you have real world race experience.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 15:30In my opinion, "real" f1 fans would appreciate a multitude of views on the state of the sport, without gatekeeping and acting abrasive.
Why did you mention it then if the reasoning was completely different, than one being discussed? It was drivers mistake misjudgment, when a driver behind brakes too late or misses the braking point, Kovalainen car was perfectly fine. There have been plenty of such accidents, that’s not what i asked for.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 15:31Webber and Kovalainen in Valencia 2010 was pretty dangerous, and that was due to a crazy quick closing speed.
Formula 1 degrades, although understandinglyfourmula1 wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 15:45+1 This is just another year in F1...it evolves...it will come around...it will be better for having gone through this. And without sounding derogatory or taking a jab at anyone I don't understand how people claim to know what "real racing" is from behind a keyboard unless you have real world race experience.DJ Downforce wrote: ↑29 Mar 2026, 15:30In my opinion, "real" f1 fans would appreciate a multitude of views on the state of the sport, without gatekeeping and acting abrasive.