Is Aston Martin BAR all over again ?

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.
User avatar
leblanc
2
Joined: 07 Mar 2024, 03:46
Location: Chicago

Re: Is Aston Martin BAR all over again ?

Post

WardenOfTheNorth wrote:
23 Mar 2026, 20:59
basti313 wrote:
02 Mar 2026, 19:09

What Newey did in the summer of 69 -> who cares
Did he get his first real six string?
I was waiting for this. Thank you for keeping up my hope for humanity.

User avatar
WardenOfTheNorth
1
Joined: 07 Dec 2024, 16:10
Location: Up North

Re: Is Aston Martin BAR all over again ?

Post

leblanc wrote:
05 Apr 2026, 16:03
WardenOfTheNorth wrote:
23 Mar 2026, 20:59
basti313 wrote:
02 Mar 2026, 19:09

What Newey did in the summer of 69 -> who cares
Did he get his first real six string?
I was waiting for this. Thank you for keeping up my hope for humanity.
You're welcome!!
"From success, you learn absolutely nothing. From failure and setbacks, conclusions can be drawn." - Niki Lauda

User avatar
JordanMugen
90
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: Is Aston Martin BAR all over again ?

Post

zoroastar wrote:
03 Mar 2026, 08:22
if they installed a mercedes engine in the back of it they wouldve probably run hundreds of more laps at full power by now. all the honda fans are trying to micro analyze this situation into a newey problem, an aston martin problem or a gearbox problem. honda need to get with the program and stop jumping in and out of the sport every time the weather changes. that would probably go a long way toward not embarressing themselves every time a new engine has to be designed.
I'm not sure that's true, apart from the new engine embarrassment and scrapped and restarted programme part which is true. Honda's slogan in 2018 was literally: "50 years in Formula One: Success and Failure"

For example,
..the RA109E underwent two major design changes. In the initial design, the engine's V-bank angle was set at 80-degrees, but the engine was plagued by vibration. After review, the bank angle was changed to 72-degrees, and a balancer shaft, which was revolutionary for a racing engine, was incorporated to reduce vibration. Another design change was to replace the timing belt drive with a timing gear drive, as the team discovered in testing that the timing belt drive lacked durability and reliability. This drastic design change was made with only three months to the start of the 1989 season, and was implemented just in time for the season-opener.
- Honda Racing
https://global.honda/en/POWEREDbyHONDA/1989_ra109e/

Can you imagine the Ferrari website saying that‽ "The Tipo 038 suffered from excessive oil consumption", it just doesn't happen, does it?

So embracing failure is the Honda way and that's OK.

The RA109E was fixed in design mere months before the series opener and the corrected parts were made with mere weeks to spare, whilst the RA626H was not fixed in time.

That's motor racing, no? :)

Of course Aston Martin Racing presumably wishes they had retained their customer Mercedes contract, and it seems like it will be difficult for them to get another such Mercedes contract (supposedly Red Bull Ford is within 9hp of Mercedes at least on the ICE and Wolff claims Red Bull Ford's ERS is the best, so if true that could actually be a pretty good choice!) but it is what it is.

In the next round of regulations, Aston Martin Racing may choose to lobby for 3.2L V12s that will enable them to commission their own Cosworth engine, analogous to the one in their WEC car. :)

Obviously the air-cooled V8 that Honda built to combat the benchmark Cosworth DFV V8 was so terrible, the company withdrew from the sport entirely, amongst many times! Failure is always an option.

User avatar
JordanMugen
90
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: Is Aston Martin BAR all over again ?

Post

basti313 wrote:
03 Mar 2026, 14:08
Well, at least that was what we can compare to BAR-Honda: The Honda engine was not the problem in 2007.
The claim of BAR (chassis built by Reynard at the time, 'Reynards always wins first time out') about winning their first Grand Prix was with their initial Supertec/Mecachrome engine, no? How did other Supertec engine users fare in 1999?

basti313 wrote:
03 Mar 2026, 14:08
Honda jumping in for BAR with funny ideas like the earth dream car and then jumping ship...just to come back a few years later unprepared. Then jumping out again just to loose all personal to come back again a year later...
It's the Honda way. :D