Ferrari SF-26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
AR3-GP
594
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

matteosc wrote:
27 Mar 2026, 02:10
AR3-GP wrote:
26 Mar 2026, 23:11
atanatizante wrote:
26 Mar 2026, 23:00

I made a mistake in my initial wording, because what I actually meant is that the movable wing (the former DRS flap) performs a rotational motion not forward, but backward and upward, undergoing a rotation of approximately 135 degrees, so that this movable wing reaches the same position as in the case of the “Macarena wing.”

In addition, if for this movement the movable wing must rotate around axes located in the endplates, an alternative solution would be for the wing to be lifted from the rear (not from the front using a central actuator as in the DRS era), by means of two actuators embedded in the endplates, using metal rods that follow a 135-degree travel/trajectory between the closed and open positions.

Thus, at the lateral ends of the movable wing there is a small pin/bolt on each side, which connects to the actuator rod in each endplate. The connection is not made on the surface of the endplate, but instead follows a curvilinear groove machined/embedded into the endplate.
It must have a fixed rotation axis
b. Adjustment of RW Flap is about a fixed axis of rotation, which must be aligned with the Y-Axis.
Furthermore, in Corner Mode, the axis of rotation must:

the alternative would be to commit to a shorter mainplane so that the flap can just continue rotating in the same direction to get back to the closed position. Moving it that way would generate more coherent aerodynamics while the wing closes. The flow would attach sooner, and the load would increase gradually.
You mean a shorter mainplane leaving a gap with the second element? I doubt that would be optimal from an aerodynamic point of view, with the wing close (which is the majority of the time).
Yes that's the compromise, but if that wing is giving extra 5 km/h, it could be worth it at specific tracks like Monza, Baku, Jeddah, Las Vegas where there is not much downforce needed when the wing is closed.
Beware of T-Rex

matteosc
matteosc
31
Joined: 11 Sep 2012, 17:07

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
27 Mar 2026, 02:13
matteosc wrote:
27 Mar 2026, 02:10
AR3-GP wrote:
26 Mar 2026, 23:11


It must have a fixed rotation axis




the alternative would be to commit to a shorter mainplane so that the flap can just continue rotating in the same direction to get back to the closed position. Moving it that way would generate more coherent aerodynamics while the wing closes. The flow would attach sooner, and the load would increase gradually.
You mean a shorter mainplane leaving a gap with the second element? I doubt that would be optimal from an aerodynamic point of view, with the wing close (which is the majority of the time).
Yes that's the compromise, but if that wing is giving extra 5 km/h, it could be worth it at specific tracks like Monza, Baku, Jeddah, Las Vegas where there is not much downforce needed when the wing is closed.
You could be right, I guess we'll see. My impression is that it would not be worth it... only time (or CFD) will tell.

Brahmal
Brahmal
68
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Ferrari has scheduled its first filming day (200km) of the year at Monza. Lewis Hamilton and Charles Leclerc are set to alternate driving duties on a circuit that, in terms of layout, will be one of the most challenging for energy management.

The choice to use the fast Italian track was made immediately after Australia - and as far as we know, other teams are also considering holding one of the two permitted filming day sessions at Monza. Ferrari has set April 22 as the date - which, weather permitting, will allow testing of most of the updates that will later be brought to Miami. This is not the ideal scenario for the Maranello team, which had planned to split part of the developments across the two canceled races in Sakhir and Jeddah, bringing the main components to Bahrain.

Loic Serra’s guidelines were to implement updates in small increments, without introducing large macro packages, as was more common under predecessor Enrico Cardile’s management. With the cancellation of the two Middle Eastern races, this approach will inevitably be disrupted.

A revised floor - intended for Bahrain - is the main upgrade for increasing aerodynamic downforce. It will be fitted to the SF-26 that will run the 200km at Monza on April 22. Some parts on the car will concern additional aerodynamic changes and weight reduction, while in Miami there will also be components related to cooling management.

In Miami we will also see again the two halo wings that popped up in China practice and were removed because they did not comply with a detail relating to the material used, which must be the same as the halo structure.

Monza is a crucial point because there is a race against time in Maranello to produce the new updated “Macarena” wing, which had originally been targeted for a Montreal debut. The test in China confirmed what the team feared - namely that the specification used in Bahrain testing cannot yet be used in races because it does not provide sufficient rear stability under combined braking conditions (with a non-straight steering angle). From what has been learned, the team is currently working to finalise the structural specification which, compared to the prototype version tested, will be both lighter and feature aerodynamic modifications. The target is to test it at Monza - to evaluate any further small optimisation interventions ahead of Canada. For Miami use, the sprint format leaves some uncertainty, but a decision will be made after April 22.

Ferrari should still keep the option open regarding which of the rear wing specifications to use from time to time, the classic version (seen in the first three races) or the Macarena version. For now, this dilemma mainly exists on circuits such as Monte Carlo, where the traditional flap-opening specification might be preferred.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/ferr ... ril-break/

User avatar
nico5
25
Joined: 12 Mar 2017, 18:55

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Brahmal wrote:
04 Apr 2026, 02:22

the two halo wings that popped up in China practice and were removed because they did not comply with a detail relating to the material used, which must be the same as the halo structure.
This sounds like bs as they passed FIA tests and even raced. Such a clear cut failure to meet regulation standards would never go down well with the FIA nor the teams.

johnnycesup
johnnycesup
7
Joined: 13 Sep 2024, 11:31

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

nico5 wrote:
04 Apr 2026, 22:51

This sounds like bs as they passed FIA tests and even raced. Such a clear cut failure to meet regulation standards would never go down well with the FIA nor the teams.
IIRC it was only used in a FP session, wasn't it?

Luscion
Luscion
136
Joined: 13 Feb 2023, 01:37

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

johnnycesup wrote:
05 Apr 2026, 02:24
nico5 wrote:
04 Apr 2026, 22:51

This sounds like bs as they passed FIA tests and even raced. Such a clear cut failure to meet regulation standards would never go down well with the FIA nor the teams.
IIRC it was only used in a FP session, wasn't it?
yea it was taken off after free practice, and like the previous poster said the issue was that it had to be made of the same material as the halo but the first versions werent

matteosc
matteosc
31
Joined: 11 Sep 2012, 17:07

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Luscion wrote:
05 Apr 2026, 04:49
johnnycesup wrote:
05 Apr 2026, 02:24
nico5 wrote:
04 Apr 2026, 22:51

This sounds like bs as they passed FIA tests and even raced. Such a clear cut failure to meet regulation standards would never go down well with the FIA nor the teams.
IIRC it was only used in a FP session, wasn't it?
yea it was taken off after free practice, and like the previous poster said the issue was that it had to be made of the same material as the halo but the first versions werent
This would point to Ferrari wanting to test their effect, before committing to produce more espensive parts made of halo material.

JoeE
JoeE
2
Joined: 26 Dec 2009, 15:36

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Pirelli: First wet test day at Fiorano with Hamilton

Image

Farnborough
Farnborough
151
Joined: 18 Mar 2023, 14:15

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

A very good, and interesting, image.

Look at flow pattern coming through the "barge" board vertical slats as it clears the airflow to eject it away from going under the floor leading edge.

Also the amount of water that's hitting the front circumference part of rear tyre (obviously absent from front tyres) to ultimately be rotated around under the contact patch. Some of the far reaching ejection of airflow outside of the rear tyres in last regulation set appears to substantially be gone now.

User avatar
SilviuAgo
109
Joined: 15 Aug 2020, 16:08

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Ferrari filming day updates:
• Spec 2 floor
• Rear-end aero updates
• Flick Tail Mode area changes
• Halo appendages
• Weight-saving changes
• New front wing
• Updated “Macarena” rear wing
• Hydraulic system optimization

Image
Source: @Auto_Racer_it

Fakepivot
Fakepivot
4
Joined: 13 Jul 2023, 10:19

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Image

some spy shots from monza test

Luscion
Luscion
136
Joined: 13 Feb 2023, 01:37

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Image

matteosc
matteosc
31
Joined: 11 Sep 2012, 17:07

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Fakepivot wrote:
22 Apr 2026, 21:20
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HGh4T4_XQAE ... ?name=orig

some spy shots from monza test
What is that appendix about and how is it legal?

User avatar
SiLo
144
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

matteosc wrote:
22 Apr 2026, 22:22
Fakepivot wrote:
22 Apr 2026, 21:20
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HGh4T4_XQAE ... ?name=orig

some spy shots from monza test
What is that appendix about and how is it legal?
Probably exactly the same loophole that Mercedes is using for the little flicks on the rear wing.
Felipe Baby!

matteosc
matteosc
31
Joined: 11 Sep 2012, 17:07

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

SiLo wrote:
23 Apr 2026, 10:43
matteosc wrote:
22 Apr 2026, 22:22
Fakepivot wrote:
22 Apr 2026, 21:20
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HGh4T4_XQAE ... ?name=orig

some spy shots from monza test
What is that appendix about and how is it legal?
Probably exactly the same loophole that Mercedes is using for the little flicks on the rear wing.
What do you guys think the purpose is? Generating a vortex.