Red Bull RB22

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
venkyhere
39
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

1) why is the yellow colouring not extend laterally 'all the way to the tub'
2) the angle of the 'hardrock' sponsor sticker, doesn't it seem opposite to the general understanding that there is 'more undercut' (less blocking under inlet) now ?

Brahmal
Brahmal
61
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

Now that is something. Between these and the Ferrari grid-fins, I don't know how the regulations are allowing these sorts of developments.

User avatar
venkyhere
39
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

This keeps getting more and more interesting. I wonder whether they are chasing performance mods that are supposed to take the car from 99% to 99.5%, whilst the car is actually at 80%.

loekf2
loekf2
0
Joined: 17 Sep 2018, 16:51

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

venkyhere wrote:
27 Mar 2026, 17:33
This keeps getting more and more interesting. I wonder whether they are chasing performance mods that are supposed to take the car from 99% to 99.5%, whilst the car is actually at 80%.
They really have no clue, right ? Maybe they are waiting for the new windtunnel to become on line, but it takes you quite some time to get the windtunnel and your modeling in sync.

User avatar
AR3-GP
589
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

I don't know if the flow viz was set with straight line mode open or closed.

Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

venkyhere wrote:
27 Mar 2026, 17:33
This keeps getting more and more interesting. I wonder whether they are chasing performance mods that are supposed to take the car from 99% to 99.5%, whilst the car is actually at 80%.
That sounds about right. For example there doesn't seem to be anything for the understeer in these updates. It always seems that they are always chasing something in the updates for the cooling instead of where the issue lies which seems to be weight and understeer. Since Wache took over as the main guy from Newey it seems to be a pattern when you look at how many inlet and sidepod variations since mid to late 24.

User avatar
AR3-GP
589
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
venkyhere
39
Joined: 10 Feb 2024, 06:17

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

So this picture suggests that the sidepod change is :
1 more downwash on top
2 NIL 'undercut' at the bottom (there is close to zero x-wise flow 'underneath' the sidepod, above the floor)

Brahmal
Brahmal
61
Joined: 19 Oct 2024, 05:07

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post


User avatar
PlatinumZealot
566
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

Insane level of intricacy. Explains that the slowness of this car is not down to aero. It's just overweight. I can see why they are not panicking.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: Red Bull RB22

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
16 Apr 2026, 23:47
Insane level of intricacy. Explains that the slowness of this car is not down to aero. It's just overweight. I can see why they are not panicking.
Maybe the front wing has some work to do but the rest of the car looks AOK on aero and more importantly when they bring updates it either has no improvement or a loss. Weight is the main issue but I think there is something in the front suspension / steering geometry that needs fixing and certainly the gearbox needs to be sorted out as well because those are the 2 areas that the drivers seem to be complaining about and struggling with. The huge amounts of understeer is horrible.