Dont know if it was mentioned here but David Croft(Sky F1) says B spec car and beta version of 2027 PU to be introduced in SPA.
Also vibration fix approved for Miami.
When? Where? I only heard this from you...
I heard that rumor before. But that's very far away...
I'll believe it when I see it.
Best news so far !
I don't think that YouTube channel is a reliable source
The financial implications of your engine partner's PU blowing up every two races is undeniable.ispano6 wrote: ↑15 Apr 2026, 10:11Don't blame Honda for McLaren's own short comings. Only people who are unwilling to accept responsibility are those who fail and blame others. Trying to blame a mass production engine manufacturer for a luxury marquee's downfall is real rich. Sounding like a poor sport and loser.makecry wrote: ↑14 Apr 2026, 02:58Here is how I see this whole situation. Honda is not ready. Honda not being ready is not ok.ispano6 wrote: ↑11 Apr 2026, 19:05
Don't bother, it's not worth your time.
Just sit back and enjoy watching Honda bring another Golden Era of F1 to a team like it did for Williams, McLaren and Red Bull. You don't go 11/12 and 21/22 wins in a season without a jewel of an engine. Sure, it starts off as a rough diamond or a lump of coal.
I'm rooting for AMR and Newey to get it right and flourish under Honda power.
Mercedes, Redbull, Audi, Ferrari are doing fine. Honda PU is the worst. These are objective facts.
They may dominate 5 years from now but that's a discussion for if/when that happens. Right now, Honda is not ready for the upper echelons of formula racing and should be criticized for it. Honda not being ready has an impact on a lot of talented engineers, on the company's finances (AMRs) and the drivers. That is not ok.
McLaren-honda project nearly bankrupted McLaren and they lost all sponsors. Honda can not be the reason that happens to any team. That is unacceptable.
It's not like AMR were front runners or even near the front of the midfield at the end of 2025. Expecting to be at the front was an unrealistic pipe dream. 3 races into the season and we don't even have cars that are fully developed. I can understand if people are complaining 2-3 years into this Formula but only one manufacturer was going to come out on top and surprise surprise. But will it stay that way? Stay tuned.
I didn't listen to the podcast yet, but the associated article includes this quote from it,
From that it's pretty hard to know if that's an educated guess, or something communicated by someone in the know in the team. Plus it's Croft, so who knows! I imagine Newey would probably dispute the term "B-spec car" as well, but let's assume some package of significant revisions.SkyF1Website wrote:Speaking on the same podcast as Brundle, fellow Sky Sports F1 commentator David Croft said: "To get to the end of a race [in Japan] was amazing for them, to be fair, but that's a long-term project. [...] "I'd said Silverstone for a B-spec car, that's more likely to be Spa for a B-spec car. A power unit that will need a lot of work and fine-tuning and will probably come back after the Christmas break better off for it.
I don't know what they ment....I just read a random tweet from some guy "Natchez" or something like that.bigblue wrote: ↑15 Apr 2026, 22:06I didn't listen to the podcast yet, but the associated article includes this quote from it,
From that it's pretty hard to know if that's an educated guess, or something communicated by someone in the know in the team. Plus it's Croft, so who knows! I imagine Newey would probably dispute the term "B-spec car" as well, but let's assume some package of significant revisions.SkyF1Website wrote:Speaking on the same podcast as Brundle, fellow Sky Sports F1 commentator David Croft said: "To get to the end of a race [in Japan] was amazing for them, to be fair, but that's a long-term project. [...] "I'd said Silverstone for a B-spec car, that's more likely to be Spa for a B-spec car. A power unit that will need a lot of work and fine-tuning and will probably come back after the Christmas break better off for it.
Edit: I found the Aston conversation at 44min into the 31st March podcast, and there's not a lot more info or context there. I don't know where this suggestion of the "beta version of the 2027 PU" comes from unless you think that "come back after Christmas" bit implies that (I don't, I think it meant that Honda really need to re-group and develop during the off-season, but it's a pretty incoherent statement that's hard to understand).
That is correct. It doesn't mean that reliability upgrades can not produce performance improvements.WardenOfTheNorth wrote: ↑16 Apr 2026, 11:01Presumably there's a limit to how "new" this particular PU can actually be?
I'm assuming it's the same basic PU with reliability upgrades in place.
Anything bigger than that would need ADOU wouldn't it?