Sure it was just about adequate to be called F1 here. That's not a good sign for some of the faster circuits with less braking like Canada, Silverstone or Austria. If we're back to energy starvation there and the drivers continue to have to choose between taking a corner like Copse as fast as the car is able to and harvesting through them to go faster on the straight then we're still going to be back to looking like the farce in Suzuka.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 22:48We already had China which was also energy rich and it was a yo-yo fest.gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 22:44This is one of the most energy rich circuits on the calendar. IIRC only Monaco and Singapore have more harvestable braking available. Lets wait and see how things look in Canada before saying the changes made any real difference.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 21:28The balance of energy limitations in race trim was a lot better than the previous races. Closing speeds were lesser. Drivers were having to go all the way to the brake zone to make their moves. F1 has to find compromise between old and new fans. We are close to what that looks like.
2 of the straights in Miami had 250kW MGU-K power limits. The superclipping was more powerful. So they drained the energy more slowly and they could charge faster. That's part of why driver's could overtake one another over the course of 2 laps instead of yo-yoing for 10 laps. It made it feel like drivers could actually accomplish a pass that they earned, rather than to just lose their position immediately every single time in order to create a social media friendly gimmick.
We are straddling the lines of actual sport and entertainment.
I can't promise anything about the future races but I enjoyed this more than the previous ones and imo the concept of the updates (strategic 250kW limits and faster charging) will improve things on the more energy starved circuits.gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 22:58Sure it was just about adequate to be called F1 here. That's not a good sign for some of the faster circuits with less braking like Canada, Silverstone or Austria. If we're back to energy starvation there and the drivers continue to have to choose between taking a corner like Copse as fast as the car is able to and harvesting through them to go faster on the straight then we're still going to be back to looking like the farce in Suzuka.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 22:48We already had China which was also energy rich and it was a yo-yo fest.gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 22:44
This is one of the most energy rich circuits on the calendar. IIRC only Monaco and Singapore have more harvestable braking available. Lets wait and see how things look in Canada before saying the changes made any real difference.
2 of the straights in Miami had 250kW MGU-K power limits. The superclipping was more powerful. So they drained the energy more slowly and they could charge faster. That's part of why driver's could overtake one another over the course of 2 laps instead of yo-yoing for 10 laps. It made it feel like drivers could actually accomplish a pass that they earned, rather than to just lose their position immediately every single time in order to create a social media friendly gimmick.
We are straddling the lines of actual sport and entertainment.
That we agree on. It was the most normal feeling race weekend of the year so far and this isn't a track or location I like at all (worst of the US tracks by some distance).AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 23:00I can't promise anything about the future races, I enjoyed this more than the previous ones.gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 22:58Sure it was just about adequate to be called F1 here. That's not a good sign for some of the faster circuits with less braking like Canada, Silverstone or Austria. If we're back to energy starvation there and the drivers continue to have to choose between taking a corner like Copse as fast as the car is able to and harvesting through them to go faster on the straight then we're still going to be back to looking like the farce in Suzuka.AR3-GP wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 22:48
We already had China which was also energy rich and it was a yo-yo fest.
2 of the straights in Miami had 250kW MGU-K power limits. The superclipping was more powerful. So they drained the energy more slowly and they could charge faster. That's part of why driver's could overtake one another over the course of 2 laps instead of yo-yoing for 10 laps. It made it feel like drivers could actually accomplish a pass that they earned, rather than to just lose their position immediately every single time in order to create a social media friendly gimmick.
We are straddling the lines of actual sport and entertainment.
What did Hamilton get when he cut every turn in front of Alonso?Wouter wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 23:37WOW! That is really harsh!
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HHbLUB0WAAA ... =4096x4096
Top post on page 172 in the Ferrari thread is where you’ll find your answermzso wrote: ↑04 May 2026, 00:36Why isn't Leclerc's wing flipped here? Malfunction?
https://imgbox.com/NhNp1zAj
https://youtu.be/5gYys4GL7S0?t=400
Well, made sense .. like the old DRS gamesCjC wrote: ↑04 May 2026, 01:16Top post on page 172 in the Ferrari thread is where you’ll find your answermzso wrote: ↑04 May 2026, 00:36Why isn't Leclerc's wing flipped here? Malfunction?
https://imgbox.com/NhNp1zAj
https://youtu.be/5gYys4GL7S0?t=400
Why not? We all know that once things string out it would be much more difficult to pass. Ham was more than alongside Franco and was entitled to go for it. Had it been max he would've been praised either way for going for it too.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑04 May 2026, 02:51
Hamilton too fighting Colapinto was not needed at all and he austained huge damage as a result.