The advantage will be having an engine because Mercedes will certainly drop Mclaren after this PU cycle.
I disagree with all of this except V10 or V12 and steward professionalization, I am fine with that.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 23:30If we want to be serious about it F1 has to bring back simple V12 and V10 engines, allow for unlimited budget so innovations could be shown, allow more tyre manufacturers in the game so the tyres can play a huge role again, allow for testing each time they are going for a two week break so teams can find huge amount of times, bring back fueling with another way of strategy in the game and of course bring real paid stewards instead od semi ones.
Mclaren have been able to drag themselves from the depths and become a viable business again, purely because of the budget cap. You wont find anyone against it there.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑04 May 2026, 08:08That was always the reason F1 exists. F1 apart from being a competition is a factory where new inventions that will be put on cars years later are tested. There shouldnt be restrictions in budgets.
That has been said many time, but it has never been true. This is about "road relevance" and such, but for many years it has been the other way around... Manufacturers lobby to get rules in their favor, so they can use technology they already understand. Its one of the reasons we have this mediocre formular right now.Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑04 May 2026, 08:08That was always the reason F1 exists. F1 apart from being a competition is a factory where new inventions that will be put on cars years later are tested. There shouldnt be restrictions in budgets.
Post race Lando reckoned not, saying he thought with a perfect stop Kimi would have swept past him on the pit exit.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 21:56Yes but with risk of rain if they pitted and there was rain that means a very likely SC and Kimi get another cheap lead like in Japan.
Strategy was fine with the situation as it unfolded. With a 2.1s stop instead of 2.8s Lando stays ahead and wins.
Weird that all the top teams had issues with their stops. I think only antonelli had a 2.0 sec stop. Everyone else was over 3 seconds.BMMR61 wrote: ↑04 May 2026, 13:06Post race Lando reckoned not, saying he thought with a perfect stop Kimi would have swept past him on the pit exit.FittingMechanics wrote: ↑03 May 2026, 21:56Yes but with risk of rain if they pitted and there was rain that means a very likely SC and Kimi get another cheap lead like in Japan.
Strategy was fine with the situation as it unfolded. With a 2.1s stop instead of 2.8s Lando stays ahead and wins.