nitrotech wrote: ↑17 May 2026, 08:28
zibby43 wrote: ↑16 May 2026, 22:27
HungarianRacer wrote: ↑13 May 2026, 18:39
I read it as 3 tenths from the aero modifications alone
plus (or
minus, depending how you wanna look at it) an unspecified amount from the weight reduction measures.
... But it's Nugnes, so I don't put too much stock into this information to start with...
When I see info. from Nugnes, I throw it straight into the bin. Even a broken clock is right twice a day but not Nugnes.
I dont understand why Nugnes is brushed aside so irrationally. I did a gemini search about his reporting since 2014, and for most part, he was right in his report about upgrades. People here need to get over sporadic wrong reporting and regurgitating other posters' view of nugnes and give credit where it's due.
January 2024: Nugnes claims Merc will be sticking to a pull-rod rear suspension. W15 debuts, switching to push-rod.
Pre-2022 season: Nugnes claims Merc couldn't pass mandatory FIA crash tests and there was widespread panic at Brackley. Merc consistently denied all rumors and Merc had no problems launching the car.
For every year during the pre-ground-effect hybrid era: Nugnes claimed Ferrari would be switching to a thin, Mercedes-style nose to help fix some of the aero inefficiency issues that would always plague the Ferrari. Never happened.
One of my biggest issues recently, and has been evidenced as recently as this current season with the Merc front wing activation in China is his tendency to take routine occurrences like team XYZ asking the FIA to look at a particular team's design on a certain component and spit out a headline like, "FIA investigating Mercedes for illegal front wing!"
So, from my perspective, my brushing him aside is quite rationale. There are plenty of other sources to rely on that don't either flat-out guess (or if they are guessing, they state as much) or sensationalize headlines.