Luscion wrote: ↑28 May 2026, 16:51
catent wrote: ↑28 May 2026, 16:32
gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑28 May 2026, 04:38
I wouldn't pop the Champagne on Lewis' sim boycott being the magic bullet that suddenly turns the year back to 2018. I'd point out that Lewis has had issues with tire wear this season, probably as a result of sliding around more than Charles. This has flattered him in qualifying and hurt him in the races until now. Canada was a weird anomaly where it was more challenging to keep the tire temps above the bottom of the window (this really hurt Max during the VSC) than it was to keep them from overheating. Lewis' 2026 tendency to over heat the tires helped him a lot on Sunday in the cold temps we saw because he was able to keep his tires from falling out of the window.
I've been thinking the same thing, and Vasseur's comments and Albano's recent article largely confirms as much.
Leclerc was really struggling to get the tires up to operating temperature, while Hamilton was one of the few drivers on the grid who could keep the tires in a good temperature window.
This general trend tracks with what we've observed from Leclerc and Hamilton (going back to last season, too): Leclerc is gentler on the tires, is able to preserve them longer through stints, and these traits compound (in a positive way) in hot conditions. Hamilton, on the other hand, sees more degradation in hotter (or typical) conditions, but when the track cools, the two are much closer in performance because then Hamilton's higher-tire-energy driving style suits the conditions while Leclerc's lower-tire-energy driving style doesn't. We saw this to some extent in China, both in 2025 and 2026: in cooler, cloudier conditions, with relatively low track temperatures, Hamilton was much closer to Leclerc than at other times throughout the season.
I suspect Leclerc's front-happy, lighter-looser-rear preference, and the setup such a driving style demands, also contributes in part to this. Leclerc hates understeer and a rear that doesn't rotate, but in such cold/low-grip conditions, it may be necessary to have a more "planted" rear in order to generate tire temperature.
And then you have the track layout, which further contributes to the situation. Montreal is an extremely rear-limited track, basically no high-speed corners, lots of hard braking and traction zones, which lends itself to a rear-centric setup, and provides very few opportunities to generate tire temperature via cornering. It's a track Hamilton has historically thrived at, and he's more inclined towards a softer/planted rear generally speaking.
Thats not really been the case this year though, going off of ferrari's race reviews on their page, track temps in japan were 19c but lewis suffered really bad with wheel spin and deg where charles was over 3 tenths quicker while in China with a track temp of 38c he was third fastest, behind the Mercs. Either way if he's truly better without the sim id wait for a couple more races as the sample size of him not using the sim is still to small imo.
The nature of the track surface/tarmac plays a really big role, too. Montreal is notorious for being a low energy surface, very smooth, making it hard to generate energy in the tire.
Take that type of tarmac surface, combine it with a track layout with virtually no high-speed corners, and throw on top cold ambient temperatures, and you get a situation where it is very hard to generate tire temperature.
Suzuka, on the other hand, has a more abrasive/coarse tarmac and many more medium/high-speed turns, which allows tire temperature to be built via cornering.
So even with similar ambient air temperature, two different tracks can be wildly different in how they allow (or limit) tire temperature to be managed.
Albano also referenced China as an example of this same phenomenon, mentioning the lower temps seen there. Albano is regarded as a reliable reporter, so I tend to think it's relevant if he's also bringing it up.