Ferrari SF-26

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
PlatinumZealot
558
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

It's time to stop pretending we can interpret flow-vis. Let's just appreciate that it's an oldschool visualization tool that the engineers use for real-world feedback.
๐Ÿ–๏ธโœŒ๏ธโ˜๏ธ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘Œโœ๏ธ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ™

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
AR3-GP
633
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

It's another weekend where Ferrari has the back of the car cut open much more than any other team

Image
Beware of T-Rex

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
558
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

AR3-GP wrote: โ†‘
27 Jul 2026, 02:26
It's another weekend where Ferrari has the back of the car cut open much more than any other team

https://i.postimg.cc/cHRCsVrD/image.png
Means the engine is very sensitive to higher temperatures. Likely not as great knock-characteristics as Mercedes. If the upcoming combustion upgrade really works, there should be an aero-benefit from less venting on top of the increased power.
๐Ÿ–๏ธโœŒ๏ธโ˜๏ธ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘Œโœ๏ธ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ†๐Ÿ™

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
sucof
40
Joined: 23 Nov 2012, 12:15

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

Any ideas, opinions why they failed to be the fastest again, like in Monaco?
I have 2:
- their setup simulation is skewed to lesser track conditions, hence they look fast on friday, and fall back saturday sunday
- some big errors regarding tire management, baked in to their systems. When it matters they overheat or can not get it to temp

User avatar
gordonthegun
262
Joined: 28 Mar 2019, 23:33
Location: Monza, Italy.

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

sucof wrote: โ†‘
27 Jul 2026, 12:48
Any ideas, opinions why they failed to be the fastest again, like in Monaco?
I have 2:
- their setup simulation is skewed to lesser track conditions, hence they look fast on friday, and fall back saturday sunday
- some big errors regarding tire management, baked in to their systems. When it matters they overheat or can not get it to temp
I believe the main problem was the lack of speed on the only straight where overtaking was possible.
They sacrificed straight-line speed for cornering speed, but this choice only works if you qualify at the front and get a good start, not if you end up in traffic.

We know the ICE is not the best, and this is a significant factor, so perhaps they should have opted for a setup with slightly less downforce, even though that could have proven critical for the tires, which would have had less grip and, consequently, greater degradation.

To sum up, as we say in Italy, the blanket is too short; no matter how you pull it, you end up uncovered somewhere.

I also wouldn't underestimate the strategic error of pitting once the VSC was deployed, especially knowing how important track position was, given that overtaking was nearly impossible.

nemoqueverto
nemoqueverto
0
Joined: 10 Mar 2009, 14:24
Location: Poznaล„/Poland

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

If they choose less grip for cornering, better straight line speed - the tires would not last so long. They would not be in the fight right before the first pitstops.
E=mcยฒ

User avatar
SiLo
147
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Ferrari SF-26

Post

They were miles away from Norris' pace anyway, but likely would have had a much better race if they weren't stuck behind Verstappen.
Felipe Baby!