Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑09 Sep 2026, 08:41
PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑09 Sep 2026, 04:59
Miniscule gaps too for a seasoned Ferrari man versus a middle-aged inucmbent. When the later comes within a tenth of the former it feels like a win to me. Leclerc is widely agreed to be the fastest qualifier in Formula 1. I don't know why the highlights on the qualifying head to head when and old man Lewis is matching him.
Remember how Schumacher turned the tables compared to Rosberg in his third year (talking in terms of qualifying). He was behind the first year, almost equal the second year and in front the third year. Without these crashes with various midfield drivers he could be leading the title by Monaco in 2012 and be a lot of points in front of Rosberg. If Leclerc is having trouble this year what is gonna happen next year when the car goes more of the Hamilton way?
How many times is this topic going to be brought up? It’s been explained loads of times.
Until we get rid of this
software assisted driving, most skilled drivers wont make a difference (especially in quali) and that is exactly the case with Charles.
If Leclerc is having trouble this year what is gonna happen next year when the car goes more of the Hamilton way?
That doesn’t reflect well on Hamilton, given that Charles is struggling, yet he has been/is faster in many races.
As for next year, it will be quite the opposite: FIA is moving away from the 50-50 split (ICE-battery) towards a 60-40 split, which will allow Charles to return to his natural, aggressive and precise driving style.
There’s a pattern to be seen this year. Last year, Antonelli was slow, Piastri was still in the WDC race right up until Baku, Hamilton was destroyed by Leclerc, and Max is also struggling.
It’s impossible that Antonelli and Hamilton were able to improve their pace and Piastri Leclerc and Russell lost theirs so significantly during the winter break between seasons.
Once we do get rid of artificial energy management, right order will be restored