data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bf98/9bf9822002e6d52657463bbef7aa4bb791bc9135" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8b3c8/8b3c84a0862d5383f4f8cb2768bfc7953e35e4d1" alt="Image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6593f/6593fff6826f079cca8462573ac3126315e44ef2" alt="Image"
I luv the head-on view, the sculpting very nice! =D>
Think that's a trick of the camera.raceman wrote: rear wing shorter than the F60?
isn't it the F60 wing? Thort they were using F60 front and rear wingraceman wrote:Jan_83 wrote:
rear wing shorter than the F60?
dont think so. just a longer wheel base so the rear wing is much further away in reference to the front wing. (the front wing has been lined up.raceman wrote: rear wing shorter than the F60?
Or maybe they need more air to feed DDDVasco wrote:The top plane of the side pods seems sculpted to guide some the airflow as opposed to last years car which was just flat. I guess they went with a RBR/FI style front nose due to achieve lower drag and as a result save on fuel.
considering we think the engine can be hard to keep cool ( compairing the cooling of the R and TR)Pit wrote:Well, I managed to get in.. But did they cover they diffuser with some kind of cloth? Or is it just the crap quality?
imightbewrong wrote:They have something really funky going on at the rear crash structure, is there a hole in it where the wing mounts?
I think they are 2009 spec, look identical when overlaying in PS.timbo wrote:Am I wrong or it's last years front tyres? Look too wide to me
that's my impression too.imightbewrong wrote:I think they are 2009 spec, look identical when overlaying in PS.timbo wrote:Am I wrong or it's last years front tyres? Look too wide to me