Jersey Tom wrote:Speed doesn't kill. Stupid does.
I think it's more that one of speed and stupid is fine, it's the combination that kills. A lot of crashes are due to drivers going fast when they shouldn't, thus reducing their margins for error, and reducing the time they and other drivers have to respond to unexpected situations.
I think having some knowledge of racing and extreme car performance is helpful; when it was snowy here in the UK, I could feel quite accurately when the grip was going and so was able to be safer on the ice. Saw a few people get it wrong and skid majorly- braking was particularly bad, those ABS brakes really unsettle the car when they come on, and some people don't know at all what to do when skidding while braking.
That said, I think that racing often has a harmful effect in young guns deciding they are the next Hamilton and simply driving too fast when it's not safe.
I hate to come out being so opposed to the thing we all love, but I just don't think people are generally intelligent enough to be trusted to drive fast. I think the limits in the UK (70mph motorways + dual, 60mph normal, 30mph in urban) are perfectly fast enough. Lethal crashes still happen, but I'm sure these limits save a huge number of lives.
TBH I think the main thing we could do to reduce road crashes would be to raise the driving age, maybe to 21. Most bad crashes are at least partly down to driver 'attitude' and people tend to be more mature at 21 than 17.
You'll probably be surprised when I say I'm only 18; I tend to go much more safely than other people of the same age, and even I scare myself sometimes. But the majority of people I know my age I quite honestly think aren't mature enough to drive.
But short of a maturity test, what can we do about that.... It's a tough question. I really don't know which way I'd vote if it were put to a referendum.
(Once again, TheMinister sails straight past the actual engineering question being asked....)