data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb719/fb71942656b09a4408a399b1e046dd8ecde1351f" alt="Razz :P"
Source please?Blackout wrote:Renault is bringing a lot of developments in Bahrein. A diffuser that is said to be even more extreme than the present one, is in the list.
Stephane Samson from Radio Monte Carlo, so it might be only gossip.mx_tifosi wrote:Source please?Blackout wrote:Renault is bringing a lot of developments in Bahrein. A diffuser that is said to be even more extreme than the present one, is in the list.
I'm a little surprised that Ross has decided to run the mods past the FIA. He didn't do that last year and learned that it worked pretty well ..JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Even with a Diffuser developed by Zeus himself, Renault would still be behind.
They did not have any pace at all on the long runs and were pretty woeful on the short stints too.
Of course I wasnt there, so I cannot say how much fuel was on board. But Sauber and Force India are looking stronger bets.
Mercedes have something, Ross Brawn saying what he said regards Charlie Whiting is a little window of what they have. It pushes the envelope and thats exactly what I expect of Ross and Mercedes =D>
BreezyRacer wrote:I'm a little surprised that Ross has decided to run the mods past the FIA. He didn't do that last year and learned that it worked pretty well ..JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Even with a Diffuser developed by Zeus himself, Renault would still be behind.
They did not have any pace at all on the long runs and were pretty woeful on the short stints too.
Of course I wasnt there, so I cannot say how much fuel was on board. But Sauber and Force India are looking stronger bets.
Mercedes have something, Ross Brawn saying what he said regards Charlie Whiting is a little window of what they have. It pushes the envelope and thats exactly what I expect of Ross and Mercedes =D>
Of course he did it last year, I read somewhere that Brawn,Williams and Toyota had shown their ideas before the Season, I think RedBull(?!) had a slightly different idea and they got a "no go" from the FIA...BreezyRacer wrote:
I'm a little surprised that Ross has decided to run the mods past the FIA. He didn't do that last year and learned that it worked pretty well ..
That's what I remember too.Ganxxta wrote:Of course he did it last year, I read somewhere that Brawn,Williams and Toyota had shown their ideas before the Season, I think RedBull(?!) had a slightly different idea and they got a "no go" from the FIA...BreezyRacer wrote:
I'm a little surprised that Ross has decided to run the mods past the FIA. He didn't do that last year and learned that it worked pretty well ..
JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Even with a Diffuser developed by Zeus himself, Renault would still be behind.
They did not have any pace at all on the long runs and were pretty woeful on the short stints too.
Of course I wasnt there, so I cannot say how much fuel was on board. But Sauber and Force India are looking stronger bets.
Raptor22 wrote:BreezyRacer wrote:I'm a little surprised that Ross has decided to run the mods past the FIA. He didn't do that last year and learned that it worked pretty well ..JohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Even with a Diffuser developed by Zeus himself, Renault would still be behind.
They did not have any pace at all on the long runs and were pretty woeful on the short stints too.
Of course I wasnt there, so I cannot say how much fuel was on board. But Sauber and Force India are looking stronger bets.
Mercedes have something, Ross Brawn saying what he said regards Charlie Whiting is a little window of what they have. It pushes the envelope and thats exactly what I expect of Ross and Mercedes =D>
He didn't bother to run it past the FIA because he sat on the Overtaking Working Group committee and he raised the point that the rules were not clear and that there was an opportunity to exploit it. He was mouthed down by Ferrari who got caught with their pants down and guess who shouted the loudest about the illegaility of double diffusor's....?
This time they may be pushing beyond what could be considered a singular interpretation of the rules and therefore they would need a written piece of paper thats says, "we checked and Charlie said it's ok.."
We don't talk about the same Kubica I thinkJohnsonsEvilTwin wrote:Blackout
But the Renault is dog slow according to Kubica.
He is already talking of this being a "long season".
The long runs in comparison with the top 4 is roughly 1.1 seconds a lap slower than the best.
James Allen said that ?0.7 from the lowest of the top 4. There are various figures from different sites but i will get to my point.
Don't understand that question; my English is not so good...The upgrades are due yes, but can I ask you this......
What sort of investment will a venture capital firm invest in development of an F1 car?
A vortex is a spining charge of airflow. A vortex is generally pointed at a surface to reduce drag, even though it creates some drag itself. A vortex is also used to make airflow conform to a surface change. Rule of thumb is that airflow can accept about 7 to 10 degrees of angular change in the flow over a surface without separating. With a good vortex that angle can be almost doubled. Lastly a vortex can also act to increase airflow directional stability.F1_eng wrote:And Ferrari and Renault.
I really enjoy pre-season speculation, by both fans and "journalists".
There is so much rubbish being thrown around by people, simply because they know a tiny bit more than someone else.
In particular I enjoy journalists trying to write technical reasons behind car concepts, which is always absolute garbage. Things like "bla bla.... channeling air along the nose, sealing off the nose with vortices."
If you use the word vortex, most people will believe what is said.
Let me pose you guys a question:
Why do you want to guide a vortex towards a particular region of the car? For example the side-pods or rad ducts as I think someone here mentioned.
And don't just mention the usual reasoning which is to seal the sides of the floor.